Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 5, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated before the Planning Commission are two resolutions. The first <br />resolution is approving the zoning code amendment to Chapter 1113, and the second is <br />approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Review for a car wash at “The Station”, <br />2280 County Road I. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek wanted clarification regarding Resolution 907-09 and the 10- <br />foot residential district boundary. She confirmed with staff that The Station’s property does not <br />abut a residential district. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked about the delivery truck drivers that park in The Station’s parking <br />lot. They deliver to The Station, and then deliver to Fedor’s while still parked at The Station. <br /> <br />Mr. Leon Theis, 2280 County Road I, indicated there is plenty of room for the trucks and <br />customer parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller added the improvements that Mr. Theis has done to the property are great. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Stevenson/Commissioner Lang. Resolution 907-09, <br />approving a zoning code amendment to Chapter 1113, to add car washes as a Conditional Use in <br />B-2 zoning districts. Planning Case No. TX2009-001 <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek/Commissioner Rundle. Resolution 908- <br />09, Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review for a car wash at “The <br />Station”, located at 2280 County Road I. Planning Cases CU2009-002 and DE 2009-001. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. Review Accessory Building Code Amendment <br /> <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated the Planning Commission reviewed this code <br />amendment at their last two meetings. He stated it was brought before the City Council, who <br />had concerns with the 20 foot height limitation and felt that was too tall. The Council was <br />concerned that a resident could build a 20-foot tall flat roof building, or have a rambler style <br />home and a 20-foot high accessory building that would be taller than the primary structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit suggested specifications for different styles of homes. <br /> <br />Director Roberts stated the City Council did not want to get that specific, but was more <br />concerned with accessory buildings built with a steep roof like a chalet, which is completely <br />different from the house. He added the City Council is concerned about larger accessory