My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-2009
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
08-19-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:07:19 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:02:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/19/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission August 5, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />buildings and would like the roof to match the house roof style. He thought the City Council <br />was trying to get away from design of the structure. He indicated the issue is not resolved and <br />staff is looking for ideas from the Planning Commission. He added staff will make some more <br />changes and this will be back before the Planning Commission at the August 19th meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson suggested to remove the language “whichever is less” from Chapter 1104 Subd. <br />3; Height Limitations. Secondly, to address the flat roof issue, we could add language such as “a <br />minimum of a 2-12 pitched roof is required.” <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek added that if a resident wants to put in a green roof, the roof <br />would need to be flat to grow the plants. <br /> <br />Director Roberts stated if a resident wants to have a flat roof for a garden, the resident would <br />need to apply for a variance and come before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Planning Commissioner Lang indicated he wanted to keep the proposed language in Chapter <br />1104.03 subd. 3 Height Limitations: “not to exceed the principal structure, whichever is less”. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson questioned if 20 feet was too high. He added that when the Planning <br />Commission suggested 20 feet, it was for residents to be able to store RV’s inside their garages. <br /> <br />Director Roberts asked if 18 feet would be adequate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit suggested the code language should read if it is a two story home it <br />should not exceed 20 feet to the peak and if it is single story it should be a foot less than the peak <br />of the house. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the trend in the last few years for new garages has been <br />residents wanting storage space above the garage so they are building them taller. <br /> <br />Director Roberts indicated the new drafted language would be brought before the Planning <br />Commission at the August 19th meeting. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: <br /> <br />A. August 19, 2009 <br />B. September 2, 2009 <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />8. Adjournment to Agenda Session <br /> <br />There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the <br />meeting at 8:03 p.m. <br />______________________________________________________________________________
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.