My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-06-2008
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-06-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:22:59 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:15:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/6/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 23, 2008 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller presented the PUD zoning code amendment that was discussed at the <br />July 9th Planning Commission meeting. She asked if the Commissioners had any additional <br />changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause questioned the second whereas, number 6 regarding the age of 55 <br />years and wondered if it was possible for someone under the age of 55 to live at this complex. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated this was a good point because with assisted living or memory care <br />there could be situations with individuals under the age of 55. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated that these types of developments have an age limit themselves <br />but we could add language such as the “majority of persons who are 55 and older.” <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned the age for independent living. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson suggested the primary focus could be for keeping independent living to age 55 <br />and over, and leaving assisted living and memory care open to under the age of 55. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the majority of persons actually <br /> living in this type of housing were 55 years or older. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned if assisted living or memory care housing would <br />apply to the Metropolitan Councils’ request for city’s to increase their senior housing. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the Met Council does not distinguish between the different <br />types of senior housing, and that this new development would satisfy the senior housing <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek wondered if increasing the age of 55 for independent living <br />and the majority of residents in assisted living and memory care would meet the goals. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated this would make it worse because you are <br />limiting the number of units that could count towards the senior housing goals. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated these types of requirements are too complicated for a code amendment. <br />He stated the amendment doesn’t need to address memory care and assisted living age limits, it <br />should only address senior housing, which is the age of 55 and up. <br /> <br />Director Roberts stated there are other facilities and services available for individuals who are <br />under age 55 and need assistance rather than this type of housing, so he believed the amendment <br />would have trouble with under age 55 due to the state definition for seniors. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller suggested amending number six to read “permanent residents residing <br />in independent living designated units shall be limited to persons who are 55 years of age and <br />up.”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.