Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission July 23, 2008 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller presented the PUD zoning code amendment that was discussed at the <br />July 9th Planning Commission meeting. She asked if the Commissioners had any additional <br />changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause questioned the second whereas, number 6 regarding the age of 55 <br />years and wondered if it was possible for someone under the age of 55 to live at this complex. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated this was a good point because with assisted living or memory care <br />there could be situations with individuals under the age of 55. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated that these types of developments have an age limit themselves <br />but we could add language such as the “majority of persons who are 55 and older.” <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned the age for independent living. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson suggested the primary focus could be for keeping independent living to age 55 <br />and over, and leaving assisted living and memory care open to under the age of 55. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the majority of persons actually <br /> living in this type of housing were 55 years or older. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned if assisted living or memory care housing would <br />apply to the Metropolitan Councils’ request for city’s to increase their senior housing. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the Met Council does not distinguish between the different <br />types of senior housing, and that this new development would satisfy the senior housing <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek wondered if increasing the age of 55 for independent living <br />and the majority of residents in assisted living and memory care would meet the goals. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated this would make it worse because you are <br />limiting the number of units that could count towards the senior housing goals. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated these types of requirements are too complicated for a code amendment. <br />He stated the amendment doesn’t need to address memory care and assisted living age limits, it <br />should only address senior housing, which is the age of 55 and up. <br /> <br />Director Roberts stated there are other facilities and services available for individuals who are <br />under age 55 and need assistance rather than this type of housing, so he believed the amendment <br />would have trouble with under age 55 due to the state definition for seniors. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller suggested amending number six to read “permanent residents residing <br />in independent living designated units shall be limited to persons who are 55 years of age and <br />up.”