My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-06-2008
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
08-06-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:22:59 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:15:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/6/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 23, 2008 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated number five on the resolution should be clarified. He recited the <br />proposed amendment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek stated this is establishing a city code not just for one <br />development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause suggested having number 5 read as follows: <br />(5) The parking recommendations are as follows, unless the City Council determines <br />more or less parking stalls would serve a better purpose: <br />A) Parking spaces require for independent living = 1 space per unit with half the <br />spaces enclosed; <br />B) Parking for assisted living = 0.5 spaces per unit <br />C) Parking for nursing homes/memory care = 1 space for every 4 beds <br />D) Parking for assisted living/memory care facility staff = 1 space for every <br />employee working on the largest shift. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lang questioned the rear yard restrictions being the same as the R-4 district when <br />last meeting we talked about the R-4 district being doubled. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the development would fall under the new PUD ordinance <br />unless it is less than two acres where then it must be rezoned to R-4. The double side yard <br />setback is specific to R-4 zoning and senior housing and wouldn’t apply if the applicant were <br />using a PUD zoning. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lang stated in the heading it states Senior Housing and R-4 so we are sending <br />applicants to R-4 Senior Housing. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller indicated applicants would not be looking in the R-4 zoning section. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson suggested incorporating the setback requirements into the PUD section. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated she would make the amendments to the code and bring it back <br />to the Planning Commission at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause asked if this would delay the proposed project. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the applicant has already made application and didn’t want to <br />wait for this code amendment to take effect since it would delay them by at least a month. Their <br />goal is to break ground yet this year if they can get city approval in time. <br /> <br />___________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.