My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2007
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
01-24-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:46:52 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:27:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission January 10, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated Staff’s review indicates this request satisfies City code except for a shed <br />that would be moved or removed from the property. He mentioned on the issue of consistency of <br />the minor subdivision, the overall development of this lot would need to be combined with the <br />church property or a new subdivision must come forward within a year. Director Ericson <br />explained the minor subdivision would need to be recorded in Ramsey County and the new <br />deeds filed to make it official. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that what is before the Commission is strictly a request for a minor <br />subdivision. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek asked why the lot was subdivided in the flag shaped manner <br />with a 10.7-foot frontage. <br /> <br />Director Ericson replied the church wanted to preserve the row of pine trees on the lot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit asked who currently occupied the home. <br /> <br /> Director Ericson replied the church owns the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Jerry Kunz, 8284 Pleasant View Drive, spoke on behalf of the church and reported the house <br />is currently unoccupied. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated the Planning Commission is charged to not allow lots with less than a <br />minimum of 75 feet access onto a public roadway, therefore creating dead lots. He stated his <br />feeling is that because the applicant has one year to submit a plan for the property, it must be <br />highlighted that this is not a creation of a dead lot and that it would reverted back to the original <br />configuration if it is not adjoined to the rest of the church property or development has not come <br />forth. He stated the Planning Commission wants to be up front that it is not the norm to create a <br />lot that does not conform. <br /> <br />Director Ericson added it is not a conforming lot in a conventional sense nor is it intended to be a <br />separate buildable lot with access to a roadway. He explained if it were a stand-alone property <br />with no adjoining neighbors absorbing this property, the Planning Commission or City Council <br />would not approve it. He explained that subdivisions that create a landlocked lot where there <br />was future impending development have been approved in the past. He stated that <br />nonconforming lots have been created with the requirement that it be attached to other property. <br />Director Ericson explained that in this case the subdivided property from the lot on Eastwood <br />Road would be attached to the church property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if this is explained in the resolution. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson replied it was and pointed out the comments on page two of the resolution. He <br />stated that perhaps it should be spelled out further. He said the staff recommendation wording is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.