My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2007
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
01-24-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:46:52 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:27:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission January 10, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />somewhat better than what is in the resolution. Chair Stevenson asked that the resolution clarify <br />what the applicant must do within the year to become compliant. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated Staff could add a stipulation that the lot in and of itself as created is <br />not a buildable lot. He stated there is a provision that stipulates it is invalid if the church does <br />not effectuate it within the year. He stated the deeds could not be sealed until something occurs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if anything should be said about the wooden fence. <br /> <br />Director Ericson replied nothing had to be mentioned. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted this was not published as a hearing; however there are residents in <br />attendance that may wish to speak to this topic. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated residents may speak if they wish, but currently the Commission is only <br />looking at the church’s request to split the lot and take the back off the existing lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Sikorski, 8340 Sunnyside Road, stated he lives just south of the proposed property. He <br />stated his concern relates to what the future plans are for the property. He reported the large <br />number of senior coop units would cause concern with the people in his area. He stated this is a <br />low residential zone and that is the way it should stay. He said if there is a plan to upgrade the <br />subdivision and change the zoning, he has a major complaint with the proposal. He stated some <br />of the items brought up include the eyesore created by a huge development in a low residential <br />area, safety concerns in an area with children and increased traffic, a single lane street that would <br />be a burden with increased traffic flow, parking would be an issue, noise is one of his biggest <br />concerns, church parking is already an issue and this would make it worse, water and sewer <br />capacity would be an issue, utility upgrade requirements, storm water runoff, and the increased <br />need for police and emergency services, he was looking forward to a plan for sidewalks on that <br />side of the street, and setting a precedence for a low density area. In summary, he stated he does <br />not have a problem with the subdivision as long as it does not lead to rezoning the property <br />resulting in an undesirable effect on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Alan Smith, 8385 Sunnyside Road, asked if the potential fate of parcel B is that it could be <br />sold within the year before parcel A is resolved. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson replied it could be sold and the fate of it would not change if the Planning <br />Commission were to change the boundaries of parcel B from 100 feet to 90 feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith asked if parcel B were sold with the house on it and the church was unable to resolve <br />the issue with parcel A, would the subdivision revert back to the original configuration. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson replied if it were sold, parcel B could revert back. <br /> <br />Director Ericson replied, at this point, the property at 8184 Eastwood Road is one large piece of <br />land with a house on it. He explained that if the church were to sell this property without any
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.