My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-07-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-07-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:47:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:27:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/7/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Station Staff Report <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Technical Issues <br />he Certificate of Survey and Title Commitment have been sent to the City Attorney’s office <br />ezoning Discussion: <br />ccording to the City Code, in order to approve a rezoning request, it must be determined <br />egarding the first criteria, the request would currently be inconsistent with the <br />dverse Effects Test <br /> <br />T <br />for review. The City’s Public Works Department has reviewed the site plans and does not <br />have any issues with what is proposed. They indicated that any driveway access changes <br />could be made when the street reconstruction project happens in this area. Staff has also <br />sent the site plans to Ramsey County Public Works due to The Station being located on <br />County Road I. <br /> <br />R <br /> <br />A <br />that the requested zoning designation would (1) be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive <br />Plan, and (2) not be detrimental to the neighborhood or adversely affect any adjoining <br />properties. <br /> <br />R <br />Comprehensive Plan land use map, which designates this area as “Neighborhood <br />Commercial”. The existing B-2 zoning designation is consistent within a Neighborhood <br />Commercial guided area, although the existing gas station does not fit either of the current <br />zoning or Comp Plan designations. A gas station requires a higher intensity zoning and <br />comp plan designation, both which have been requested. As to the second criteria, however, <br />the request may conform to the subjective adverse effects test, which will be explored in <br />greater detail below. <br /> <br />A <br />o assess whether a proposed rezoning is appropriate or not, many factors should be <br /> the present case, The Station is bordered on two sides by roadways so properties beyond <br /> <br />T <br />considered, some of which are explicitly articulated in the Code. The first benchmark may be <br />the area in which the subject property is located and the zoning designations of surrounding <br />uses. A rezoning to a more intensive designation may not be inappropriate if the surrounding <br />uses already bear a more intense designation. <br /> <br />In <br />those adjacent to the site will be examined. To the north of The Station, across County Road <br />I, is primarily R-1 single family residential housing. The Station building is attached to two <br />other spaces which are used as office and commercial. The west side is owned by the New <br />Brighton Alano Society, and the south side has been leased by a manufacturing company, <br />and Fedor’s Market is the property to the south. This small commercial area is zoned B-2 <br />which is appropriate for all of the current uses, except for the gas station. Cross of Glory <br />Lutheran Church is across Adams Street to the east, and there are several R-4 multi-family <br />rental housing buildings to the west side. From this review, a zoning amendment to B-3 may <br />seem inappropriate due to the lack of higher intensity commercial zoning in the area, <br />although this case is unique in that the use of the property would not change with the <br />rezoning. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.