Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />contacted Community Development staff about their concerns and Community Development <br />Director Ericson responded to them with a letter. He suggested that an option would be to raise <br />their fence, but the Amundsens feel offended since their fence has been there for 15 years and the <br />retaining wall has only been there since last year, so why should they have to bear the cost of a <br />new fence. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated that he and his neighbor have this exact same situation and they have <br />never had a problem, although he agreed that someone could go over the fence with retaining <br />wall assistance and asked what the distance from the wall to the fence is. Ms. Amundsen replied <br />two to three inches. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked what the purpose of the retaining wall is. She also asked what the <br />fence is made out of. Ms. Amundsen replied the neighbor wants to put a car between his garage <br />and the fence. She added their fence is green treated pine. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked if the landscaping has changed. He also asked if the retaining wall <br />is complete. Ms. Amundsen replied the landscaping has changed but she is unsure if the wall is <br />complete. She added they are also concerned that the neighbor has created a three-inch, two-foot <br />gully that constantly fills with debris and will probably start deteriorating their fence over time. <br />They tried speaking with their neighbor but got nowhere, so they contacted Director Ericson. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if their neighbor discussed putting up the wall before it was erected <br />and if so, did the Amundsens address the liability issue at that time. Ms. Amundsen replied they <br />tried to dissuade him from putting up the wall but he was not willing to discuss it. She added <br />they did not discuss liability at that time since it just occurred to them when they received their <br />insurance statement. <br /> <br />Mr. Amundsen stated they are here tonight in hopes that the Commission would give direction to <br />the building department to contact the neighbor and have them remove the wall. The wall runs <br />about 30 feet along the entire side of the neighbors garage next to the property line. Director <br />Ericson replied the neighbor cannot concrete the area, but changing the grading is allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked what the wall is made of and, if wood, is it treated. Mr. Amundsen <br />replied old treated 2 x 6 pieces against 4 x 4 posts, which were removed from the house’s <br />wheelchair access. Fill was brought in from a new home constructed on Pleasant View Drive in <br />order to bring the grade level with the driveway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked if, as an option, their neighbor were required to construct a six- <br />foot fence along with the retaining wall, would it solve their problem. He also asked if, as <br />another option, they would be interested in the neighbors paying for them to extend their fence. <br />Mr. Amundsen replied the neighbor constructing a fence would solve their problem. He added <br />they are trying to avoid any additional expenses. Ms. Amundsen noted her concern would be <br />that the neighbor uses whatever materials he can find. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull asked if their insurance premiums increased or will increase. Mr. Amundsen <br />replied they have not; however, they have not brought the issue to the insurance company yet <br />because they were hoping to work it out with the City. <br />