Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 7, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Acting Chair Miller asked Director Ericson if Mr. Slabiak can take his request for a variance on <br />appeal to the City Council if the Planning Commission denies this application. Director Ericson <br />stated it is the right of any applicant to take a denied request on appeal to the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked Mr. Slabiak if this facility is only for the collection or will meetings or <br />exchange of machines for value be conducted here also. Mr. Slabiak said this is only for <br />maintaining and working on his collection to pass on later. No meetings or sales will be held from <br />this building. There will be no storage of chemicals or paint supplies, only cleaning supplies. He <br />restores and dismantles these machines. The chemicals he uses are the same type one would use <br />on cars. He restores these machines to a point they look like they have been used, not to make <br />them flawless. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked where these pinball machines are stored now. Mr. Slabiak stated they <br />are in their home, garage and a rental storage unit. Commissioner Scotch commented that the <br />backyard is totally buffered by trees and the lot is lengthy. <br /> <br />Mr. Slabiak commented he would like to place the building in back so as not to disturb neighbors <br />or his family. He talked to neighbors and there does not seem to be a problem with the <br />construction of this building. Commissioner Scotch asked if adding on to the home would <br />accomplish the same goal. Mr. Slabiak restated he wants the machines removed from the home <br />and out of reach of his children and his wife does not want them in the home. <br /> <br />Mr. James Lund, 14035 Hillsboro Court, Savage, MN, addressed the Commission, stating he owns <br />property to the back of Mr. Slabiak’s lot. Mr. Lund said he would like to develop the land behind <br />into single-family housing in the future. He has waited because other developers are trying to <br />develop to the north. He does not want to alienate his neighbor if he decides to develop his <br />property. Mr. Lund indicted that he believes Mr. Slabiak’s intention to have the building 60 feet <br />from the north line is plenty. His major concern is that the building will not look like a pole barn <br />type building. He also wants to save the tree buffer. Mr. Lund is also glad Mr. Slabiak is not <br />putting in a driveway to this building. Mr. Lund would like the plans to be approved before he <br />begins construction. He wants to be sure the footprint is 10 feet or more from the back lot and at <br />least 15 feet from the north line. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland does not see how this can be approved, given the criteria they must <br />follow. The only way it will fit the criteria is to increase the criteria to 2,400 square feet. He is not <br />suggesting that be done. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Hull. To approve Resolution 839-06, a Resolution Recommending <br />Denial of a variance request for 2,468 Square Feet of Accessory Storage Space at 8135 Long Lake <br />Road; Planning Case No.VR2006-003. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn commented this was an eloquent argument pointing out that 1125 is a <br />guideline rather than a document cut in stone. He believes there are extenuating circumstances for <br />individuals with large lots when they need outbuildings that would normally be construed as a <br />large outbuilding, but on a large lot it meets the liberal criteria that could be established for this.