My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:09:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Integra Homes Request <br />June 21, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Integra Homes is requesting a rezoning of the identified parcels to reflect an R-3, Medium <br />Density designation. The R-3 zoning designation would explicitly permit Single family <br />dwellings, twinhomes and townhomes. Schools, churches, day care centers and multiple <br />family developments would require a conditional use permit (CUP) in an R-3 district. Integra <br />has proposed development of a nineteen unit owner-occupied townhome development. <br /> <br />Rezoning Criteria: <br /> <br />Chapter 1125 of the Mounds View Zoning Code addresses rezoning requests. The <br />procedure and conditions of approval are the same as for conditional use permits, which <br />means the Planning Commission is to consider possible and potential adverse effects of the <br />requested rezoning. The Planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and make a <br />recommendation to the City Council based upon the review of potential adverse effects and <br />finding of fact. <br /> <br />Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. According to the Comprehensive Plan, the site is <br />designated as a mixed-use planned unit development. This is defined as land containing a <br />building or buildings with significant amounts of residential uses in combination with <br />commercial and/or office uses. Sites with this designation should be developed as planned <br />unit developments (PUDs) to ensure that efficient, integrated and well-planned development <br />occurs. One of the key components of the Comprehensive Plan, the Housing Element is <br />geared toward maintaining and improving the quality and diversity of the existing housing <br />stock and providing infill housing opportunities where both possible and practical. The <br />proposed rezoning would help promote a greater diversity of housing choices in the <br />community, based on the applicant’s concept townhome development proposal. Rental <br />housing or multi-family units would not be considered an improvement to the City’s housing <br />stock diversity. <br /> <br />Geographical Area. The subject area proposed for redevelopment currently consists of a <br />vacant commercial property (formerly operated as a small gas station), a single family <br />residential home and the subdivided back half of another single-family residential property. <br />(The applicants subdivided the property at 8060 Groveland Road in 2005.) Adjacent to the <br />northwest on County Road 10 is a residential property which already bears the R-3 <br />designation. To the southeast is a residential office property operating as “Johnson’s Trailer <br />Hitches.” The properties to the rear of the subject parcels are zoned R-1, single family <br />residential, and are developed as such. Properties on County Road 10 tend to be developed <br />to a greater intensity, whether commercial or residential, than in other parts of the <br />community. Directly south of the project area across County Road 10 are two townhome <br />developments—Knollwood Green and Northridge Villas. <br /> <br />Depreciation. The question of depreciation is a difficult one to answer with any quantifiable <br />certainty. Most studies which examine property value impacts of development generally find <br />there to be little correlation between a project and subsequent property values. While <br />property values may not depreciate as a result of the development, one can argue that <br />quality of life for the existing residents that would be adjacent to the project could be <br />negatively impacted. Strictly from the perspective of tax base and market values, the <br />rezoning would promote a substantial increase in market value at the site, increasing from <br />the present approximate valuation of $460,000 to an estimated $4,750,000—a ten-fold <br />increase in value.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.