My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:09:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Integra Homes Request <br />June 21, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Character of the Surrounding Area. The project area is located on County Road 10, the <br />City’s primary commercial corridor. Within two blocks of the site, one can find a variety of <br />commercial and residential uses. The residential uses include single family residential, <br />owner-occupied townhomes and multi-family rental dwellings. In the immediate area <br />however, the predominating land use is single-family residential. <br /> <br />Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. The applicant desires to rezone the property to allow <br />for owner-occupied townhomes. This type of housing is under-represented in the City’s <br />housing demographic. The primary housing option in the City is single family detached with <br />higher-density rental housing and manufactured homes second and third respectively. <br />Owner-occupied townhomes and senior housing (independent or assisted) units are less <br />prevalent. <br /> <br />The requested rezoning to R-3, Medium density residential, would not be out of character for <br />the County Road 10 corridor and would not be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, <br />which anticipated a mix of housing and commercial / office development in this area. The <br />proposed development that would be permitted via the requested rezoning would increase <br />the market values of the subject area by a factor of ten—from $460,000 to $4,750,000. <br />While enhanced market value is desirable, the Commission needs to determine if the <br />potential density allowed would be too intensive for the subject area, which is primarily lower <br />density residential. The applicant feel this type of housing is in demand and would be a <br />positive complement to the City’s housing stock. <br /> <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br /> <br />Staff sent notices to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property and published a <br />copy of the notice in the New Brighton Bulletin regarding the May 17, 2006 public hearing. <br />Only one written comment has been received to date, that being from the residents at 8080 <br />Groveland Road. They write: <br /> <br />Because we are bordering your proposed project on two sides, we want to give you <br />our input. We are not able to attend the meeting due to a handicap. Our opinion is <br />that a multi unit building will be available to least desirable neighbors. Individual <br />houses would mean a class of people that can afford to own property, keeping the <br />area safe and property appearance acceptable. Please consider these issues in <br />your planning. Thank you. Mr. & Mrs. Roy Droel, 8080 Groveland Road. <br /> <br /> <br />At the public hearing which was held on May 17, 2006, residents Duane Waldoch, Mark <br />Schnor and Cindy Johnson spoke to the request, each expressing varying degrees of <br />opposition to the request. Only one individual spoke in favor of the request, a resident <br />residing in the townhome development across the street in Spring Lake Park. The same <br />Mounds View residents expressed their same concerns at the June 7, 2006 meeting. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.