Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: Jan 19, 2005 <br />Type of Business: Review <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Review and Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan <br />Future Land Use Map Amendment Associated with the <br />Bridges of Mounds View Site <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The City of Mounds View has been actively exploring redevelopment options associated with <br />the Bridges site located north of Trunk Highway 10 in the northeast corner of the City. <br />Presently operated as a municipal golf course, the City Council has been actively considering <br />other options as a means to enhance and improve revenues and the tax base. <br /> <br />On September 13, 2004, the Economic development Authority (EDA) of the City of Mounds <br />View authorized the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) that would <br />assess the maximum development potential of the Bridges site assuming an office or light <br />industrial land use and the impacts of such a development. Other actions have been <br />authorized by the EDA regarding the possible redevelopment of the site. One additional <br />action step is needed which has been contemplated in the AUAR report—the City’s <br />Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended so as to be made consistent with the property <br />zoning as well as with the underlying assumption of the AUAR—that of an assumed or <br />desired corporate office campus. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The City Council authorized a rezoning of the Bridges site in October of 2003 from Public <br />Facilities (PF) to Industrial (I-1). Minnesota Statutes, as articulated in the MN Land Planning <br />Act, requires that the zoning of a property not be inconsistent with the City’s Comprehensive <br />Plan, so it becomes necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the anticipated <br />future land use of the site, which is currently being proposed as an Office (OFC) designation. <br />While other designations may be consistent, such as Light Industrial Planned Unit <br />Development (LI-PUD) or simply a Light Industrial (LI) designation, either of which could <br />accommodate the proposed corporate office complex, it has been determined that an OFC <br />designation would most closely correlate with a planned corporate office complex. <br /> <br />The internal process of preparing and approving a comp plan future land use amendment is <br />fairly straightforward—the Planning Commission would hold a public hearing (which is <br />scheduled for your meeting on February 2, 2005) and consider the proposed designation for <br />the site, forwarding the recommendation back to the City Council for final approval. The City <br />Council has opted to forward the amendment to the Met Council PRIOR to Council approval, <br />which would provide the City Council with an opportunity to accept or reject the amendment <br />after sufficient time has passed to assess the current redevelopment proposal or any <br />subsequent proposal.