Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 4, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated he was availing himself of the opportunity to address issues not <br />on the agenda and there is nothing restricting ones ability to make statements and since this <br />Commission is part of, or reports to, the City Council that, in his opinion, is having some <br />problems and struggles with running the City properly he felt he could make the comments. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if Commissioner Zwirn understood that if comments he wished to make <br />did not pertain to planning and zoning matters then this would be not the appropriate venue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated there is nothing that restricts him from that at this point. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated that, as Chair of the Planning Commission, he is restricting further <br />comments on items not related to planning and zoning matters or business of the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland said he agrees that if it is not Commission business then there are better <br />venues for it and, it is Chair Stevenson’s responsibility to manage the meeting so if having <br />something in the Bylaws makes that easier for the Chair to do so, he would agree. He then said <br />that he felt this was something that was understood by Commissioners. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller suggested stating under Item 4 on the Agenda that the comment period is <br />for items related to planning business of the City. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff could do that. He then said that Commissioner Zwirn is <br />right in that there is nothing currently that would restrict the comments and that is why he feels it <br />is appropriate to bring this before the Commission for a possible amendment to the Bylaws to <br />help regulate the types of public comments heard at the previous meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Werner said he liked the emphasis on freedoms in the Staff’s memo on the matter. He then <br />asked who drafted the Bylaws for the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated that there have been Bylaws since the original Commission was <br />established and the Commission reviews them annually for any necessary changes. <br /> <br />Mr. Werner indicated that the Chair should have the authority to limit comments that are not <br />appropriate to the discussions. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he would feel better doing so if there was something in the Bylaws <br />that stated he was allowed to do so. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated he felt the Bylaws should state what the purpose of the <br />Commission is and that the Commission is to stick to the business of the Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Staff to review the bylaws to determine whether it clearly states the <br />purpose and duties of the Commission. <br />