My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Correspondence
>
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 5:13:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
1/1/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HOLMES & GRAVEN <br /> CHARTERED <br /> Attorneys at Lime <br /> M.LEFEYRL JR. <br /> 470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 ROBERT 1.-BALL <br /> BERT A.ALSOP (612)337-9300 LAURA K.MOLLET <br /> NALD H.BATTY BARBARA L.PORTWOOD <br /> STEPHEN J.BUBUL Facsimile(612)337-9310 JAMES M.STROMMEN <br /> JOHN B DEAN JAMES J.THOMSON,JR. <br /> MARY G.DOBBC(S LARRY M.WERTHEIM <br /> STEFANIE N.GALEY BONNIE L W1LSL'7S <br /> CORRINE A.HEINE GARY P.WINTER <br /> JAMES S.HOLMES WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL DAVID L GRAvty(1929.1991) <br /> DAVID J.KENNEDY <br /> OF COUNSEL <br /> JOHN R.CARSON <br /> WELLINGTON H.LAW ROBERT C.CARLSON <br /> CHARLES L.LEFEVERE ROBERT L.DAVIDSON <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Members of the Mounds View Charter Commission <br /> FROM: David J. Kennedy, Commission attorneyIC) <br /> DATE: November 4, 1992 <br /> RE: Discussion Draft -of Possible Charter Amendments <br /> Attached is a discussion draft containing a number of possible <br /> amendments to the charter together with comments on each proposed <br /> change. <br /> Many, but not all , of the points raised in Ms . Orduno ' s memorandum <br /> of July 30 are addressed in one way or another in the draft. <br /> One way of proceeding to consider these changes (a method I have <br /> found useful with other commissions) is to take them up one by one <br /> and make a preliminary decision about the desirability of each. <br /> Those that survive this first cut can then be revisited for a <br /> closer look at the language and a final recommendation. <br /> If the Commission finds the approach taken in this draft useful, it <br /> might consider authorizing me to proceed to review the entire <br /> charter in this way. There is something to be said for cleaning up <br /> the entire charter once you 've started. On the other hand, there <br /> are some constraints on your time and resources that may make that <br /> impossible . At this point, however, I think that kind of revision <br /> could be done within the budget set up by the City Council for this <br /> work. <br /> Finally, some of the comments refer to legal principles and <br /> authorities that I have not described fully. I hope that <br /> Commission members will feel free to ask me to elaborate on any <br /> point about which they are unclear. <br /> Attachment <br /> D43820 <br /> MU125-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.