My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-1997
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
Council Minutes 1997
>
08-25-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2007 3:50:41 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 3:50:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />August 25, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />would withhold the city's support while other opportunities are investigated and if that opportunity does not <br />work out, the council could go back and authorize the funds. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Trade/Stigney to Approve Resolution No. ,Withdrawing Support of Public <br />Housing Funds. <br />A discussion followed in regard to the six month sunset clause on the funds whereby if the funds are not used <br />within six months the funds would automatically go to other competing cities. Ms. Bennett explained that the <br />$200,000 for the rehabilitation of the project were Ramsey County funds and they were approved by Ramsey <br />County and set aside until December 31, 1997. The Holman unit funds were approved by a separate <br />resolution. Discussion also centered around whether the resolutions of support passed by the City Council <br />would obligate the city to proceed at this time. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he is concerned about the appearance that the city is "tinkering around" with funds that <br />are earmarked for persons of less economic stature, etc. He is concerned that having the development <br />contingent upon a retail conversion could create problems. The neighbors adjacent to the properly which <br />would require a zoning change have not had an opportunity to provide input. He feels the Council should take <br />time to consider the options, however and work through all of the details. He would be interested to see what <br />the residents who would be affected by the zoning change have to say. <br />• Attorney Long recommended that the Council delay the resolution and take time to look at the issues more <br />closely. <br />Ms. Trade stated her main point of the resolution is to let the public know that even though the developer made <br />it appear at the last meeting that he could proceed, he does need the city's support. Mayor McCarty noted that <br />the other issue is whether or not the developer is dependent upon the funds in order to be able to proceed which <br />is not known at this time. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to table Resolution No. <br />VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays (Trade/Stigney) Motion Carried <br />REPORT5• <br />Report of Council members: <br />Koopmeinera: No report. <br />Stigney: Council member Stigney stated he feels fortunate to have been able to serve with Ms. Trade and he <br />hopes he will be able to emulate through her example. <br />Quick: Council member Quick wished Ms. Trade Good Luck. <br />Mayor McCarty: Mayor McCarty took this opportunity to explain what an Exclusive Negotiating <br />Agreement meant. <br />• Trade: Ms. Trade encouraged the public to stay on top of the issues affecting residents in the community. <br />She stated she has enjoyed working for the residents over the past four years. She took this opportunity to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.