Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br />September 8, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Mayor McCarty asked that resident's questions and concerns be addressed prior to the staff report so that staff <br />could respond to some of these questions. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated he, as well as other residents of the community, do not want any <br />more apartments in Mounds View. <br />Cameron Obert, 8315 Greenwood Drive, wondered if there were residents in the audience who had not seen <br />MSP Real Estate's proposal and if so, he felt it would be helpful to have the developer make a brief <br />presentation. <br />Mary , 8330 Eastwood, stated it is her understanding that residents throughout Mounds View <br />have indicated to the Council that they would like them to delay any action on the project approval process and <br />pursue other possibilities for the development and/or improvements for the property. However, because they <br />did not feel they were being listened to, residents looked at alternatives to delay/stop the proposed development <br />in order to allow more citizen input. A referendum has been drafted asking that resolutions recommending <br />approval of the development be put on a ballot at the time of the next election or that a zoning change be <br />initiated on the property. The required number of signatures has not been attained, however it is their intent to <br />continue circulating the petition to get the number required if the city council refuses to put the development <br />proposal on hold. <br />. Mayor McCarty explained that the funds from Ramsey County have specially be earmarked for rehabilitation of <br />the existing Red Oak Apartments. If the City Council rescinds their support of that resolution and funding, they <br />would infect be stopping the renovation of the apartments. <br />L. W. Stigney, 7841 Eastwood Road noted that the petition currently has approximately 450 votes opposing the <br />project from all cross sections of the city (they are running a little over 90% disapproval rate on every street). <br />Before any votes are made, he stated he would like to hear from the entire council as to how each one feels <br />about the proposed development. <br />Mike Anderson, 8350 Eastwood Road, stated he has an in-home business in Mounds View, where he has <br />invested a substantial amount of money. In his opinion, renters generally do not care about their properties <br />because it is not theirs. He feels the city already has too many rental units. He would prefer to see a nice <br />business on that piece of property. He stated he, as well as several of his neighbors, are opposed to the <br />project. <br />Ann Connelly, a renter at Woodlawn Terrace, stated Mr. Anderson's opinions of renters is a common <br />misconception and that the condition of many rental properties is a result of careless landlords. <br />Mayor McCarty noted that some changes have been made to the original proposal. One change is that the <br />developer has withdrawn his request for Tax Increment Financing and also his request to purchase the land <br />from the city. As a result the number of new townhomes proposed for the site has decreased from sixteen units <br />to ten units. <br />Mr. Jim Ericson, Planning Associate, provided a brief summary of the changes to the original site plan. The <br />city-owned parcel is no longer a part of the development project. The townhomes, now reduced to ten, will <br />consist of seven three-bedroom units and three four-bedroom units, each with their own garage and driveway. <br />New garages will be provided for the apartments. He noted that the location of the play area has been shifted, <br />more plantings have been added to the property line adjacent to the city land. <br />