Laserfiche WebLink
APPROVED <br />Page 4 <br />• January 12, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Council member Stigney aye <br />Council member Quick aye <br />Council member Gunn aye <br />Council member Koopmeiners aye <br />Motion Carried - 5-0 <br />C. Resolution No. 5206, A Resolution of General Support to Anthony Properties, Inc., for the City of <br />Mounds View's Participation in Sharing Costs for a Traffic Light Signal on Highway 10 and <br />Edgewood Drive. <br />Mr. Whiting explained that Wendell Smith of Anthony Properties has asked him for an opinion from the <br />City Council regarding the status of the traffic light on Highway 10 and whether or not the city is interested <br />in participating in the sharing of the cost. He noted that he had drafted a resolution of support based on <br />past council actions and expressed opinions, recognizing that the city is not committin itself in terms of <br />dollars or final plans. y <br />Mr. Smith noted that they have been working on this project for over two years and working with the city <br />in regards to access to that property. In the past few weeks he has been made aware of the opposition to <br />the access onto Long Lake Road. With no access on County Road H-2 or Long Lake Road, they will <br />need some response from the Council in regard to whether or not they are in favor of a new intersection <br />and traffic signal so that they can go ahead with the project. At this time, they are limited to a right- <br />in/right-out access which they do not feel is the safest type of access into the project. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No. 5206, a Resolution of General <br />Support to Anthony Properties, Inc., for the City of Mounds View's Participation in Sharing Costs for A <br />traffic Light Signal on Highway 10 and Edgewood Drive. <br />Council member Stigney stated he has some concerns in that cost participation for the actual turn lanes and <br />curbing costs are not identified yet. He also understands that there will be a significant loss of green space <br />to the city and he wonders who will compensate for this loss. He noted that the traffic signal is not a part <br />of the ring road and should be looked at separately. <br />Council member Quick noted that if this signal is not put in, there will be a significant traffic problem in <br />that area. When the Council gets a plan, if he has any concerns, he will be asking the developer to do a <br />traffic study. <br />Mayor McCarty noted that this resolution will not lock the city into any cost configurations. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />D. Job Description for Economic Development Coordinator. <br />Mr. Whiting noted that this is basically the very same job description that existed and for which Cathy <br />Bennett was originally hired for. He would like the council's review and comments and if appropriate, <br />approval to move ahead in the advertising for the position. The title of the position has been changed to <br />Economic Development Coordinator and this person would be responsible to the Director of Community <br />