My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1998
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
Council Minutes 1998
>
01-12-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 10:03:18 AM
Creation date
8/1/2007 10:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br />January 12, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />APPROVED <br />Development. He would like Council feedback on the pay range for the position, noting that he had <br />provided the council with the pay range schedule from 1996. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the job description for Economic Development <br />Coordinator and to authorize the Clerk Administrator to proceed with advertising and interviewing <br />candidates for the position. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />E. Discussion of Other Staffing Options. <br />Mr. Whiting noted that he had considered a number of options for the Human Resource Technician <br />position and that a logical consideration would be to hire an Intern. He discussed the various options with <br />his staff and how the Human Resource Technician position could be modified to an Intern position as it <br />was several years ago. At some point, this position could be moved into an Assistant position to the <br />Administrator with Human Resource duties and other city administrative duties. He asked for input <br />from the council. <br />Council member Koopmeiners asked if the city had looked into hiring a consulting fu-m. Mr. Kessel <br />stated they had talked with two firms who contacted the city, one of which was a placement firm. The <br />other fum basically assisted with benefit management. Mr. Kesel did not think that this appears to meet <br />the city's needs. <br />A discussion followed. Council member Stigney stated he had questions as to the overall cost and funding <br />for the position. He wondered if the city should consider atime-share position with another municipality. <br />Mr. Kessel explained how the position would be funded. Mayor McCarty asked if staff anticipates <br />exceeding the budget with the new position. Mr. Kessel did not expect that the 1998 budget would be <br />affected. <br />Council member Quick stated he is not in favor of considering a time-share position. He does not feel it <br />would be beneficial to the city. Discussion followed in regard to the State's Pay Equity Standards. Mr. <br />Kessel noted that changes in the next three years will have an impact on the city's compliance with these <br />standards. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to authorize the Clerk Administrator to go forward with <br />defining„ advertising and interviewing for this position. <br />VOTE: S ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />F. First Reading of Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance Further Amending Cable Franchise <br />Ordinance 606, Article II, section 4, Franchise Term. <br />Mr. Whiting explained that last Fall the Council extended the Cable Franchise Agreement. The Cable <br />Commission is in the process of negotiating the Franchise Agreement and the city is being asked to extend <br />• the original agreement to Apri120, 1998 which should give them adequate time to complete the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.