Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Page 7 <br />March 9, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />APPRO~'~~ <br />Vince Meyer, 8380 Spring Lake Road, stated this project was started 8 months ago and he would like to <br />see it be done this year. However, he would be in favor of a 24 foot wide roadway without curb and <br />gutter. <br />Scott Hyser, 7340 Spring Lake Road, stated there have been three proposals considered by residents <br />already. The residents only want a 24 foot wide roadway, they do not need a sidewalk. <br />D. Consideration of Signalization of Xylite and County Road J. <br />Mr. Ulrich explained that staff had spoken with Phil Sype of Sysco in regard to the Council's desire to split <br />the expense of the proposed traffic signal with them. Mr. Sype indicated that they would be willing to <br />contribute $5,000 to the construction of the signal. He had also requested that the city pursue the addition <br />of the right turn lane, which staff also felt was wise. John Grey of SEH will be speaking with Anoka <br />County in regard to this. <br />Mr. Ulrich went through the estimated cost of this proposed traffic signal, noting that the cost for the City <br />of Mounds View would be roughly $35,000. <br />MOTION by Stigney to decline the proposed traffic signal on the basis that Sysco's contribution of $5,000 <br />it is too small. MOTION FAILS for lack of a second. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve the city's participation in the signal project as <br />presented (with a $5,000 contribution from Sysco) with the inclusion of a right-turn lane to be funded with <br />MSA funds. <br />Mayor McCarty explained that this is for a proposed signal at Xylite Street and County Road (new)J which <br />aligns with the driveway into Sysco. This project cost will be shared by Mounds View, Anoka County, <br />Blaine and Sysco. <br />VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay (Stigney Motion Carries <br />E. Consideration of Resolution No. 5211, Approving and Awarding of Bids for Phase II <br />Construction of the Community Center. <br />1. Review of TIF Funding Budgets: Mr. Kesel provided a brief summary of the TIF districts and <br />their cash flow as well as the impact that the expenditures for the Community Center will have on them. <br />2. Resolution No. 5211 Action: Mr. Dean Olson of WAI explained that they received bids on Phase <br />II of the Community Center Construction on February 24th and that the bids came in on budget as <br />discussed at the last Council meeting. He noted that the construction cost did not include the alternates <br />that the city had asked to be prepared for the bid package. The alternates were discussed with the Task <br />Force and they also felt that the alternates should be included in the project costs. Mr. Olson noted that the <br />bids have been published and are available for review. The total project cost from acquisition to <br />completion is roughly $6.1 million. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney to approve Resolution No. 5211, Approving and Awarding of Bids for <br />Phase II Construction of the Community Center. <br />