My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Minutes - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 10:09:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 13 <br />Apri127, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />the access as shown is the only one to the restaurant site. Ms. Ash stated her concern that people wanting <br />to avoid delays at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Highway 10 may choose to cut through the <br />restaurant site. Mr. Smith stated this is a possibility, however he does not feel people will fmd that it saves <br />them any time to use this route. <br />Julie Olson, 2663 Lake Court Circle, asked if the developer has guaranteed in writing that they will <br />provide a share of the cost for the signalized intersection. Mayor McCarty noted that Resolution 5230 <br />will require the developer to partake in the cost ($187,500). <br />Steve Miller, 2614 Clearview, stated in attending earlier meetings in regard to the development, it was his <br />understanding that the developer would assume the cost of any adjustments which needed to be made to get <br />in and out of that property. Why has the city, since that time, agreed to share in that cost? <br />Mayor McCarty noted that with the re-alignment of Edgewood Drive, the city will gain approximately an <br />additional 2 acres of developable commercial land which is valued at approximately $250,000 plus any <br />future development tax revenues that are gained. Additionally, it would provide better access to the <br />community center as well as other benefits to the community. <br />Mr. Miller asked how long it is anticipated to take to re-coup the $440,000. Mayor McCarty noted that <br />this information will not be known until such time as the land is developed, however history has shown that <br />commercial and industrial tax base has been very kind. Mr. Whiting noted that the $442,500 for the <br />city's portion was a high estimate and may not cost that amount. <br />Julie Olson, 2663 Lake Court Circle asked if Resolution 5230 could be amended to add that there would be <br />no access to County Road H-2 or Long Lake Road. Mayor McCarty stated he believes this is already in <br />the recommendation from the Planning Commission and Resolution 5230 merely supports the Council's <br />position on the signalized intersection. <br />Mr. Jay Anthony of Anthony Properties explained that full access to the development is critical and it is his <br />feeling that they can not proceed with merely aright-in/right-out access to the development. The <br />intersection as proposed will not only benefit the theater, but also the community center and the safety off <br />of residents at the Edgewood/Highway 10 intersection. <br />Jerry Linke, 2319 Knollwood Drive, stated he is generally in approval of the development but does have <br />concerns. In reference to the comment that city would gain approximately two acres with the realignment <br />of the intersection, he noted that this is already city land (park land) and that with the realignment of the <br />parking lot, the city would actually lose approximately four acres of park land. <br />Mayor McCarty stated this would be assuming that the city would use the land to the West of the realigned <br />Edgewood. Furthermore, the area that Mr. Linke refers to as a soccer field is not a regulation soccer field <br />and there are other fields in the community that are not currently being used. Other concerns expressed <br />by Mr. Linke included whether the developer has provided a space for recycling of trash and the necessity <br />of screening the proposed lighting for drivers on Highway 10. He noted that County Road H-2 is a major <br />arterial and that there should be access to it. <br />Julie Olson asked if the Council could consider tabling the resolutions until a decision is made in regard to <br />the proposed signalized intersection. She believes that without a curb cut onto Long Lake Road , MnDOT <br />will not approve the signal and therefore the project likely cannot proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.