Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br />The primary obligation of NSCC is to administer and enforce the franchise <br />agreement with the cable company. The 2009 budget for NSCC was <br />$4357496. With a current franchise term of 15 years, it can be asked why <br />such a large budget is necessary for franchise oversight. <br />NSCC and NSAC share certain personnel and operating expenses. In the <br />past, the building expenses have been shared with 2/3 assigned to NSAC, <br />1/3 to NSCC. In January 2010, Finance Director Mark Beer analyzed the <br />building usage and proposed a new allocation of operating expenses <br />between NSCC and NSAC to reflect the activities of the two organizations. <br />Mounds View proposed 2.65% of operating expenses assigned to NSCC <br />and 97.35% assigned to NSAC. A subcommittee discussed the issue, and <br />recommended a change in allocation of 80% NSAC/20% NSCC which was <br />passed by the NSCC board at their May 6, 2010 meeting to take effect with <br />the 2011 budget. This change shifts a portion of the building expenses <br />from the NSCC budget, supported by city franchise fees to the NSAC <br />budget, supported by PEG fees, but the cities are still supporting the <br />access corporation through the mechanism of operating costs allocations. <br />Concern about decreased PEG fees amounts in the next franchise period and the <br />impact of this on the member cities. <br />NSAC receives PEG support on the order of $3.50 per subscriber per <br />month, a level that is much higher than the national and local norms for <br />PEG support. Reports from other communities undergoing franchise <br />renewal point to a strong trend for lowered PEG fees, in the neighborhood <br />of $1.00 to $1.50 per subscriber per month. NSCC will negotiate for PEG <br />fees in the 2013 franchise renewal, but may not be able to maintain the <br />level of support for NSAC they have enjoyed in the past. There is concern <br />that, in the event of reduced PEG funding, they would look to the member <br />cities for support for the access corporation. The cities will need to decide <br />the best use of the franchise fees to support city communication needs and <br />if that means fiscal support of NSAC. <br />Concern about future increased facilities costs resulting from NSCC and NSAC moving <br />to a new building and the financial impact on member cities. <br />NSCC and NSAC are in the process of relocating to a new facility. The <br />operational costs will be significantly higher than at the current facility. With <br />the uncertainty of future funding levels in the next franchise, there is <br />concern that NSCC/NSAC will be looking to the member cities for <br />additional support of operating costs. <br />Opportunity to evaluation solutions for video playback, scheduling, and web streaming <br />outside of the current fee for service arrangement with NSAC. <br />