Laserfiche WebLink
It should also be noted that the radar trailer was near Groveland Court which is a short <br />distance from 85th and anecdotal evidence suggest vehicles do slow down (at least <br />temporarily) when present. <br />A brief footnote — we captured radar trailer data again on Groveland from June 19 to <br />22; average number of cars per hour dropped to 51 from 58, percent of cars going over <br />41 mph was exactly the same at 2.6% both times but the increase in the 36-40 mph <br />went from 4.6% of traffic to 13% of the traffic <br />Speed data for H2 (35 mph) for June 13 to 15 detail that 59.8% of vehicles were at or <br />below the limit, 38% were traveling 1 to 10 mph over the limit and 2.1 % were <br />excessively speeding with nearly 20 vehicle going over 50 mph of which one was over <br />65, one over 70 and one at 92 mph. <br />We captured data again from June 19th to the 21 St and seen in increase in speed with <br />11.6% of the vehicles excessively speeding and the base majority of that coming from <br />the 1-10 mph category which fell from 38% to 27.5%. Both of these studies were <br />conducted using the "Stalker" unit is typically not noticeable unless you are aware and <br />know where it is, thus a more accurate gauge of the situation. Over the last study we <br />had 16 vehicles over 66 mph with 10 over 77 mph. <br />For the time period June 14th to June 23rd our traffic enforcement efforts resulted in 130 <br />stops throughout the city with 27 of those occurring on Groveland and 8 on H2. The <br />majority of these stops resulted in a warning being issued (speed was under 10 but <br />over 5) with several citations and 8 arrests (mostly related to other criminal activity). <br />Discussion: <br />Options to address speed include; roadway design/construction, roadway maintenance, <br />speed bumps, active enforcement, passive enforcement (radar trailers), stop signs and <br />a combination of some or all of the latter. <br />Roadway design/construction is practically unavailable as an option given the recent <br />construction of both roadways. It should be noted that Groveland was designed wider <br />as a thru street and to allow for parking and bike travel where H2 was intentionally left <br />narrower without shoulders. Road design theory suggests the narrower roadway helps <br />to address speed related issues; however, our data suggests that is not the case with <br />respect to both of these roads but especially HD. <br />Arguably if a road is poorly maintained speeds will drop also. Like the design/build <br />option, Mounds View, like most cities; maintains their roads thus making this minimal <br />option a non -option as well. <br />We have considerable experience with speed bumps which in all cases, have shown <br />positive reinforcement in slowing traffic. However, resident and vehicle operator <br />feedback has, in some cases, become equal in opposition to the point necessitating <br />removal of the devices. Short term they provide relief but long term, resident opposition <br />seems to balance against speed control. <br />Active enforcement is the most effective, however, limited human resources make this <br />highly desirable option, very limited. During the summer months, with the SRO (and <br />soon to be plural) available, great enforcement can occur. However, standard staffing <br />is 2 patrol and one supervisor who respond to calls for service as their first priority with <br />traffic enforcement duties assigned if not on a call for service of subsequent report <br />writing. Chief Harder has submitted a grant that will provide funding for a full time <br />