Laserfiche WebLink
Item 08A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> <br />It is not anticipated that the accessory building will have any effect on area property <br />values. <br /> <br />4. The character of the surrounding area. <br /> <br /> The accessory building will be set back 33’ from the east side yard property line. <br />The adjacent property (2200 Bronson Dr) includes a detached accessory building <br />864 square feet in size, and is the nearest structure to the proposed accessory <br />building addition (45’ distance, building to building). <br /> <br />5. The demonstrated need for such use. <br /> <br />The applicant has demonstrated a need for an allowable use (e.g. accessory <br />building). <br /> <br /> <br />Summary <br />Doug Watson is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage, 1,536 <br />sq ft. <br /> <br />A Public Hearing Notice was published in the August 3, 2018 edition of the New <br />Brighton/Mounds View Sun Focus, and mailed to property owners within 350’ of the subject <br />property. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission considered the request on August 1, 2018, recommending approval <br />of the Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 1085-18). <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />The City Council is requested to conduct a Public Hearing, and consider the following options: <br /> <br /> <br />1. Resolution 8992, recommending approval the Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />2. The City Council may deny the request. If the City Council chooses this option, Staff would <br />need to be directed to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support <br />the denial. <br /> <br />3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or <br />if more discussion is needed, the City Council can simply move to table the request until <br />such information has been provided. Because of the 60-day requirement (Deadline: Sep <br />27, 2018) the City Council would need to act upon the request as soon as reasonably <br />possible to avoid an inadvertent approval.