My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-1998
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
Council Minutes 1998
>
07-13-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 10:13:02 AM
Creation date
8/1/2007 10:13:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br />July 13, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Koopmeiners re-read the requested Consent Agenda Items. <br />6. RESIDENTS' REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br />No resident requests or comments were considered from the floor. <br />David Janke, 8428 Eastwood Road, wished Mayor McGarry a speedy recovery. He also asked <br />if the City's golf course lost money during the year 1997 and if the facility would make money <br />for the year 1998. <br />Whiting offered to furnish Janke with the figures for the golf course's 1997 season. He told <br />Janke that to date, the facility was doing very good for the 1998 season. <br />Mr. Janke asked if the total spending to date for the construction of the Community Center had <br />in any way exceeded the Charter Commission allowance of "10 percent or 20 percent". <br />Whiting told Janke the total budget to date was $6.2 million. This amount included property <br />purchase, cost of the election, Phase 1 Children's Home Society and now Phase 2 Community <br />Center; the Community Center being the last Phase at $4.1 million. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. Consideration of Resolution No. 5251, Concerning Sufficiency of Corrected Petition <br />for Initiative Regarding the Project Commonly Known as the Theater Project. <br />Whiting gave his report as follows: <br />The first petition that was submitted contained 733 signatures. There are 859 signatures required <br />based on Charter requirements. The matter had been voted on by the City Council and a finding <br />was made that the petition as submitted was not sufficient. The Charter allows the citizens to <br />address the imperfections contained in the petition. Another 155 signatures came in and were <br />verified by the City's election judges. The revised petition count was stated as being 882. The <br />reason for the Resolution was that the petition was not worded properly and thus the Council <br />deemed the petition insufficient under the advise of the City's Attorney. Resolution 5251 <br />acknowledged the increase in the number of signatures on the petition but it also acknowledged <br />that the language of the petition had not changed, thus the recommendation that the petition be <br />considered insufficient. <br />City Attorney Long gave his report as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.