Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />August 10, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />APPROVED <br />Housing, LLC. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/ Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. <br />VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Stigney requested that his vote on the previous motion be changed because he was under the <br />assumption that Item SD of the Consent Agenda was going to be opened for discussion. He <br />added he was not in favor of adopting the Resolution in the work session so he didn't want to be <br />a party to approving an amendment. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/McCarty to reconsider Item SD of the Consent Agenda. <br />VOTE: Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution 5258, a resolution approving <br />the First Amendment to Developers Agreement between the City and MSP Real Estate, Inc. and <br />Mounds View Family Housing, LLC. <br />Mayor McCarty opened the floor for discussion of Resolution 5258. <br />Stigney stated he did not agree or vote in favor of the original development agreement. In light <br />of this fact, he stated it would not make sense for him to vote in favor of the Amendment to the <br />Agreement. <br />McGarry clarified the Resolution for the viewing audience stating that the Resolution approved a <br />standard administrative change of principles to the contract. The details of the change had been <br />discussed at a previous City Council Work Session. <br />VOTE: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried. <br />6. RESIDENTS' REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br />No resident requests or comments were considered. <br />7. COUNCIL BI,I~INESS <br />A. Consideration of Resolution No. 5257, a resolution approving the City's New <br />Organization Chart. <br />Schmidt told the Council that the only changes that had been made since discussion of the issue <br />