My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-04-2018 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
09-04-2018 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:50 PM
Creation date
9/12/2018 2:57:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/4/2018
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/4/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOU-NDIS, VVIEW <br />MEMORANDUM <br />to: Mounds View City Council <br />from: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator <br />re: September 4, 2018 Workshop Items <br />date: August 28, 2018 <br />Background: <br />Given the nature of the items for tonight I have done a single memo; as opposed to a <br />memo per item. <br />Item 2 — Strategic Planning — Update Only — Confirm ability to meet during day later this <br />fall. <br />Item 3 - Public Comment at Council, EDA, Workshop — Discussion — Consensus on <br />developing a policy refining and improving the Public Comment section of our <br />meetings. <br />There are three issues; consistency, timing, and subject matter. <br />Consistency — We clearly allow public comment under the agenda item and at <br />actual Public Hearings. However, we do not state when people can speak on <br />agenda items. Discussion on need to have printed policy that states when they talk <br />(before or after staff presentation) and then note on agenda or just make sure we <br />poll audience to see if anyone wishes to speak. <br />Secondary consistency issue is making sure we are same across other <br />boards/commissions. <br />Timing — The timing on agenda items and public hearings is set. Discussion on <br />where on agenda should public comment be on the regular agenda? At beginning <br />or at the end? <br />Subject Matter — Should public comment be a forum to allow criticism/allegations <br />against staff? Discussion on stating in our policy and the handout that the Public <br />Comment period is not for condemnation of staff. Those condemnations must be <br />filed with the City Administrator in writing with substantiating documentation. <br />Item 4 - Update on Rain Gardens — Update and confirm consensus to proceed with <br />Variance Request <br />Don and I met with Rice Creek some time ago, was and still are in the process of <br />inventorying our gardens. Rice Creek reached out to us for a meeting, we met and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.