Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member Marty asked if, after their discussion, the matter could come before a future <br />Work Session, with the neighbors present. Mayor Coughlin stated that discussion of the matter <br />• may not rise to the level of a Work Session, but certainly could be open to the public and any <br />mdlvidual Council Members who desired to address the issue. <br />Acting Administrator Ulrich stated that they should obtain the input of staff, and after their <br />meeting with the owner and neighbors, have staff report back to the Council. <br />Council Member Thomason agreed. She stated that she had a concern regarding the second <br />stipulation, in relation to the requirement that some type of buffer be placed, which would be <br />economically feasible. <br />City Attorney Long stated that he would like the opportunity to research whether or not the <br />matter was previously imposed as a condition of the license. He stated that if the specific steps <br />were outlined through dialogue between the owner and staff, the inclusion of a condition could <br />be added to indicate that if the owner did not act in good faith, action could be taken against the <br />license. He stated that, in consideration of the license renewal deadline, this approach was <br />possibly the best way to bring forward a set of measures that would be workable. <br />Mayor Coughlin assured that the matter would come before the Council in its present <br />membership, they would have the opportunity to revisit the issues, and discuss the reports <br />generated by staff at a later date. <br />S MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Marty. To Approve the Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal <br />for Robert's Off 10, 2400 County Road H2, with stipulations. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />L. Consideration of Resolution 5347 Approving the Ninth and Tenth Rider to <br />the Agreement with St. Paul Water Utility to Construct a Bituminous Path <br />within the Right-of--Way on County Road I <br />Mayor Coughlin stated that this item had been approved in regard to the Spring Lake Road re- <br />constructionproject noting, however, that it required a formal resolution in severalty. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated that he had received the Ninth and Tenth Rider from the <br />St. Paul Water Utility, noting that he had not been provided with the first eight Riders to date. <br />He stated that the Ninth pertains to the Realife Cooperative's sidewalk, which would cross a <br />small portion of the St. Paul Water Utility easement. He stated that the sidewalk would be <br />maintained by the City. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated that the Tenth Rider was in regard to a bike/pedestrian <br />path on County Road I. He stated that there were two stipulations in regard to the path. One <br />stipulation was that it was subject to City approval. The second stipulation states that no heavy <br />machinery be operated within five feet of their conduit. He stated that anything larger than a <br />loader would probably be considered heavy equipment. <br />26N:\DATA\USERSVOANB\SHARE\MINUTES\CC\ 1999\06-28-99.CC <br />