08-09-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

for road reconstruction, rather they broaden the existing agenda. She stated that Director of Public Works Ulrich and the previous Council were limited in regard to what they could offer the residents, and these recommendations provided more options, and made the entire process much smoother. • Mayor Coughlin requested, with the consent of the motioner and seconder, to add as a recommendation or specify in these policies, that in the discussion of the 18-36 months of discussion on a project prior to it officially coming before the Council for action, that in addition to Best Water Management Practices and others, an explanation of MSA funding and its options, and potential variances be included. Council Member Marty stated he would agree to this. Council Member Stigney stated he would agree to this. Chair Malerick stated she thought this would be a good addition. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve Resolution No. 5357, a Resolution Adopting the Streets Committee Recommendations for Future Reconstruction Projects, and to Add as a Recommendation or Specify in These Policies that In the Discussion of the 18-36 Months of Discussion on a Project Prior to It Officially Coming Before the Council for Action, that In Addition to Best Water Management Practices and Others, an Explanation of MSA Funding and Its Options and Potential Variances Be Included, as Amended. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Quick) Motion carned. E. Resolution No. 5355, Approving/Denying Action for the Pleasant View Drive/TH 10 Signal Survey. • Director of Public Works Ulrich stated this discussion was in consideration of Resolution 5355, a resolution approving the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pleasant View Drive, and Ramsey County Road 10. He stated this item was discussed at the last Council meeting, and a survey had been sent out to the residents inquiring if they were in favor of this traffic signal. He stated the results of the survey indicated 29 in favor, and 16 opposed. Director of Public Works Ulrich stated staff had contacted the City Administrator of Spring Lake Park, who indicated the plans had not changed from the previously drawn plans. He stated there was a plan presently before the Council, and described each area, and what it represented. He stated staff had one concern in regard to this proposal, which was the location of the island on Pleasant View Drive, and southbound traffic directed toward the intersection. He stated the concern was in regard to whether or not there was enough room between the north and south or east and west portion of the road, or if the traffic was intended to go around that island. He stated staff would require additional clarification of this matter. Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the funding of this project was approximately 12.5 percent, and it was estimated that it would cost the City of Mounds View approximately $16,500 for their 21 C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-09-99.CC