My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1999/11/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Minutes - 1999/11/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/15/1999
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 15, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 25 <br />amount of time the Planning Commission spent on this item, both in terms of the development <br />review and the conditional use permit, staff recommends approval of this proposal. He stated <br />staff has drafted Resolution 5385, which approves the development review for MSP Real Estate <br />to construct their project as indicated in the plans, if Council so desires. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the resolution contains a stipulation that the applicant install <br />signage along County Road I, to indicate "right in, right out" access at this point. He explained it <br />was hoped this would eliminate any vehicles from attempting to cross lanes of westbound traffic, <br />to access the property at this location. He pointed out that if in the future, it appears there are <br />some issues with the access the matter will be revisited. He explained that the other stipulation is <br />that the building signage will be in compliance with the City Code and the approved conditional <br />use permit. <br />The applicant was present. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Approve Resolution 5385, a Resolution Approving <br />a Development Review for aTwo-story, 46-Room Senior Assisted Residential Facility Located <br />at 2670 County Road I; Planning Case No. 573-99. <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the light standards were subject to a 20-foot limit, which <br />issue had come forward during consideration of the Theater Project lighting. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised there is no limit on the height of a light standard. He <br />explained that the Theater Project was subject to this requirement, because it was stipulated in <br />the Planned Unit Development document. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />E. Consideration of Resolution 5386, a Resolution Approving a Wetland Buffer <br />Permit for Spencer Mistelske, 2442 Laport Drive. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the applicant was before the Council to request a Wetland <br />Buffer Permit. He stated at the October 25 City Council meeting, the Council agreed to <br />authorize a Limited Use Agreement for the applicant to construct a driveway over the <br />unimproved right-of--way on Laport Drive. He explained at that time, the delineation indicated <br />the house and the proposed driveway would be a significant distance from the wetland and there <br />would be no encroachment into the 100-foot buffer setback. He stated however, when the <br />applicant and the contractor went out the site to conduct further research, they realized there <br />were a number of significant trees in the proposed path of the driveway. He explained that the <br />applicant would prefer not to remove the trees, which is likely the City's preference as well. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the applicant has drafted a plan that would allow for <br />construction of the driveway, and avoid the removal of any of the large and significant trees, <br />however, this plan would involve an encroachment into the 100-foot setback by approximately <br />10 feet. He provided the Council with the Certificate of Survey, which indicates the proposed <br />placement of the driveway. He pointed out that the driveway could still be installed without <br />encroaching upon the buffer, however, staff believes, in terms of saving the trees, it might be <br />appropriate to allow for the 10-foot encroachment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.