My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1999/11/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Minutes - 1999/11/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/15/1999
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 15, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 26 <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resolution 5386, which would allow for the <br />Wetland Buffer Permit to construct the driveway according to the plans, with a 10-foot <br />• encroachment into the buffer area. <br />The applicant was present. <br />Council Member Marty stated it appeared the applicant might be able to construct the driveway <br />along the southern edge of Laport Drive, however, this would still result in the loss of a tree. <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that in addition to this, the residents located on the corner <br />of Edgewood and Laport Drives are mowing into that area. He pointed out that if the driveway <br />runs along the property line, it would also run along somebody's sideyard, and the applicant was <br />attempting to remain at a distance from the neighbors. <br />MOTION/SECOND: QuickJCoughlin. To Approve Resolution 5386, a Resolution Approving a <br />Wetland Buffer Permit for Spencer Mistelske, 2442 Laport Drive, Planning Case 575-99. <br />Pam DeGross, 8133 Woodlawn Drive, stated her property backs up to the proposed site. She <br />stated they were not notified of this proposal until the previous week, when the survey was being <br />conducted on the land, and there is a 30-foot encroachment of the survey onto their land. She <br />stated the City plat indicates their land would not be affected at all if the applicant is permitted to <br />build on this site, because Favor Street is half the size of a regular street. <br />• Mrs: DeGross stated she was opposed to the applicant constructing a driveway upon the <br />wetlands, as they are very important to her family. She commented she was unaware what the <br />Environmental Protection Agency would have to say m regard to this proposal, particularly m <br />light of the proposed building location. She inquired regarding fire truck access, in the event of a <br />fire in this area. She stated if the driveway is as small as proposed, with many large of trees, <br />how would the fire trucks get through. She requested the Council consider this matter carefully, <br />adding that she was very concerned with the entire situation. <br />Mrs. DeGross stated the matter most upsetting to her is that the City has been conducting tests all <br />summer long in the woods, and she has inquired what is occurring, however, no one informed <br />them. She stated the City would be giving up great wetland for a new house, and there are <br />already so many houses in the City. She stated there were many other lots that are buildable, that <br />would not take wetlands. She explained there were many deer in this area, and a large variety of <br />birds. She stated if the City desired to do something with this land, they should construct a <br />walking path through it, so that everyone can enjoy it, however, they should not ruin it for one <br />house. <br />Mrs. DeGross stated the applicant would be constructing the driveway on an area that should be <br />a road, and if it is going to be a road, curbs and gutters should be installed, not just a driveway. <br />She stated this did not make sense to her. She requested the survey be redone, prior to any <br />construction on the site. <br />Council Member Stigney requested clarification of the location of Mrs. DeGross's property, in <br />relation to the proposed site. <br />Mrs. DeGross stated her home was located directly to the west. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.