Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has drafted two ordinances to address these <br />two issues separately. He explained that Ordinance 637, which would allow and set standards <br />for signage in the CRP and PF Zoning Districts has been given first reading approval by the City <br />Council, after a public hearing, and this was in concurrence with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation. He explained there was some concern regarding whether or not the language of <br />the ordinance might possibly restrict the City's objective with regard to the billboards, therefore, <br />final approval has been delayed until the billboard issue is resolved. <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated staff has also drafted Ordinance 644, which <br />would allow billboards in certain areas of the community by Conditional Use Permit, and sets <br />standards in terms of location. He explained as it is drafted, this ordinance indicates the <br />billboards would be located along or north of Highway 118 or County Highway 10, and must be <br />located on City property. He added that there must be an approved lease, oriented towards <br />Highway 10 and I-35W, and the billboards must be located a minimum of 250 feet from <br />residentially zoned property. He advised the City Attorney has indicated some concern with <br />regard to this provision, in that the billboards could not be restricted to City owned property. <br />Community Development Director Jopke advised that Ordinance 644 also sets the minimum <br />spacing requirements for billboards at 1,500 feet, measured on the same side of the same <br />roadway. He indicated that maximum sign area could not exceed 700 square feet, although some <br />temporary extensions, not in excess of 25 percent of the billboard area, as long as they are an <br />integral part of the design of the billboard, would be permitted. He explained the billboards <br />could consist of no more than two faces, which can either be back to back or angled, and no <br />more than 8 feet apart. He indicated the maximum sign height is similar to other signs m the <br />community at 35 feet, and the billboards could not obstruct vision or interfere with the view of <br />traffic or other signs. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated the Planning Commission approved a resolution, <br />which recommends to the City Council denial of Ordinance 644, based upon four findings as <br />follows: <br />1. Large billboard signs are not appropriate uses of property within CRP <br />Conservation Recreational Preservation and PF Public Facilities zoning districts. <br />These districts are intended to provide recreational opportunities, open space and <br />protect the natural environment where possible. Large advertising signs are not <br />consistent with that intent and are more appropriate to commercial and industrial <br />zoning districts. <br />2. Large billboard signs can be visually distractive and may detract from the <br />neighborhood and promote a negative image for the community. <br />3. The City Attorney has advised City staff that the City cannot limit billboards to <br />city-owned properties only. <br />4. A permit will be required from the State of Minnesota to locate billboards along <br />state and federal highways. State statutes restrict such signs to commercial and <br />industrial zoning districts only. The contemplated sites for additional billboards <br />are not zoned commercial or industrial. <br />