Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Approve Resolution 5392, a Resolution Approving <br />the Appointment of Jeremiah Anderson to the Position of Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector, <br />and Resolution 5393, a Resolution Approving the Appointment of Aaron Parish to the Position <br />of Economic Development Coordinator, as Recommended by Staff. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the Economic Development Coordinator position was previously <br />funded through TIF, and inquired if this would be the case with the new hire as well. <br />Community Development Director Jopke advised the funding of the position has not changed. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if the Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector position would be <br />funded strictly through the General Fund <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated this was correct. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />L. Consideration of an Amendment to the Construction and Removal <br />Agreement entered into between the City and Property Owners of 8300 <br />Fairchild Avenue. <br />Community Development Director explained that the Council authorized staff to proceed <br />• through the Housing Replacement Program, to assist with the demolition of the old dwelling <br />located at 8300 Fairchild Avenue. He indicated this was somewhat different than past practice, <br />in that previously the City has acquired the property, cleared it, and then sold it to a developer. <br />He explained that in this case, staff was utilizing the second option of the Housing Replacement <br />Program, which allows the existing property owner to assist with the demolition of the old <br />building, however, the property does not actually change hands. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated, in this particular case, the original agreement <br />indicated that the City would be responsible for the demolition, and for administratively carrying <br />it out. He explained that in this case, it made more sense for the property owner to handle the <br />demolition, and for the City to reimburse the cost of the demolition, as long as the property <br />owner presented staff with three bids, and the low bid was utilized, which has occurred. <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated the original maximum funding amount for <br />the demolition was $15,000, and the low bid that was accepted was $8,950. He indicated that the <br />item before the Council is an amendment to the original agreement to allow this matter to <br />proceed, with the property owner being responsible for administering the demolition, and the <br />City reimbursing the cost. <br />Mayor Coughlin inquired, as this item is officially scheduled on the EDA agenda, if it would be <br />more appropriate to recess the Council Meeting to the EDA meeting, and refer the item in <br />question back to the Council Meeting. <br />City Attorney Long stated this would be acceptable, however, what they were presently doing <br />was perfectly appropriate. He explained the reason this is a City Council item, rather than an <br />EDA item, is that the original agreement was between the City and the property owner, and <br />