My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1999/11/22 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Minutes - 1999/11/22 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:41:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/22/1999
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br />. revisions pertain to the fees charged for Planning Commission mailed agendas, and Planning <br />Commission mailed minutes, which staff suggests be increased from $10 to $54, and from $20 to <br />$144, respectively, to reflect actual costs. <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated the third revision pertains to the plan check <br />fees. He stated staff suggests additional plan check fees be charged on those projects that require <br />substantial staff review. He advised that the new language attached to the resolution indicates <br />there will be a plan check fee of 65 percent of the permit fee for all commercial permits, <br />residential permits, new dwellings, dwelling additions, garages, garage additions, decks, sheds <br />over 216 square feet, and major remodeling of homes. He explained that these projects require a <br />plan review, and therefore, should require a plan check fee. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated other items that require permits, such as roofing, <br />siding, window replacement, driveways, and fences do not require a plan review by City staff, <br />and therefore, staff suggests these projects do not require an additional plan check fee. He <br />indicated that the language in Exhibit A of the resolution reflects this. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated staff recommends approval of Resolution 5382. <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the proposed resolution, as drafted, would include staff's <br />background information, which is very specific. <br />Community Development Director Jopke advised that the resolution will reflect those projects <br />that will require a plan check fee, however, it does not include those projects that do not require a <br />plan check fee. He explained that staff would interpret this to be applicable to only those items <br />listed in Exhibit A. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />K. Update on Filling Vacant Positions in the Community Development <br />Department. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated, as the Council is aware, there are two vacant <br />positions in the Community Development Department. These are the Housing/Code <br />Enforcement Inspector and the Economic Development Coordinator positions. He indicated that <br />staff has advertised and interviewed candidates for each of these positions. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated staff is prepared to offer these positions to two <br />individuals, subject to Council approval. Staff suggests the Council approve Resolution 5392, <br />which is a resolution approving the hire of Jeremiah Anderson as the Housing/Code Enforcement <br />Inspector, and Resolution 5393, which approves the hiring of Aaron Parish for the position of <br />Economic Development Coordinator. <br />Mayor Coughlin inquired if one motion approving both resolutions simultaneously would be in <br />order, or if these items should be handled separately. <br />City Attorney Long stated it would be acceptable to approve both resolutions simultaneously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.