My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:49 PM
Creation date
11/27/2018 1:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/8/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/8/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />C. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA <br />Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be validly assessed. <br />They are: <br />1. The land must have received special benefit from the improvement. <br />2. The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit. <br />3. The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of property <br />within the assessment area. <br />The primary test for determining the validity of a special assessment is whether the <br />improvement for which the assessment was levied has increased the market value of <br />the property against which the assessment operates in at least the amount of the <br />assessment. It is important to recognize the actual cost of extending an improvement <br />past a particular parcel is not the sole determining factor in determining the amount to <br />be assessed. An exception might be a project initiated by a single property <br />owner/developer where market value increase may not be a relevant factor given the <br />nature of the improvement. <br />Another test for determining the validity of a special assessment is whether the <br />assessment is based on a uniform method for all like classes of property. For example, <br />the use of a front foot assessment for some properties and the use of a per lot <br />assessment for other properties of the same class for a related improvement could <br />result in a non-uniform assessment rate which could mean the assessment would be <br />set aside or could be thrown out by the courts. <br />D. INITIATION OF IMPROVEMENTS <br />l <br />Public improvements may be initiated in the following manner and is a summary of the <br />l Mounds View Charter, Chapter 8, Section 8.04: <br />1. Council Initiated. The City Council, on its own motion and without petition, <br />may order the improvement on at least a 4/5 vote of the City Council. <br />However, the City must still follow all statutory provisions related to the <br />local improvement process.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.