My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:49 PM
Creation date
11/27/2018 1:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/8/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/8/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br />2. Property Owner Petition. The City Council may decide, by simple majority, <br />on an improvement after receiving a petition for said improvement from the <br />owners of not less than twenty five (25%) of the properties abutting on the <br />streets named in the petition as the location of the improvement. In <br />addition, all owners of real property abutting upon any street named as the <br />location of any improvement may petition the City Council to construct the <br />improvement and to assess the entire cost against their property. In the <br />latter case, the City Council may, without a public hearing, adopt a <br />resolution determining such fact and ordering the improvement. However, <br />it is advisable to conduct public hearings on the improvement to avoid <br />misunderstanding by the petitioners and to also inform the general public <br />about the nature of the project. Proper waiver of assessments and/or <br />agreements should be obtained from each property owner affected by theimprovement. <br />3. Developer Request. A developer who is the owner of all the property <br />within the proposed subdivision may petition the City Council to construct <br />the improvement and to assess the entire cost against the developer's <br />property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. In such event, the City may, <br />without a public hearing, adopt a resolution determining such fact and <br />ordering the improvement. However, a developer's agreement, including <br />a valid and enforceable waiver of assessments if appropriate, shall be <br />negotiated and executed prior to said authorization. It may also be <br />advisable to conduct public hearings on the improvement to avoid <br />misunderstanding by the petitioners and to also inform the general public <br />about the nature of the project. <br />E. PROJECT COSTS <br />Project costs shall include, but not be limited to, the following: <br />1. Construction costs (day labor or contractual). <br />2. Engineering and consulting fees. <br />3. Administrative fees. <br />4. Right -of -Way acquisition/condemnation costs. <br />5. Legal fees. <br />6. Capitalized interest. <br />7. Financing costs.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.