My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2019 PC Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-19-2019 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 9:41:58 AM
Creation date
10/30/2019 9:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
MINUTES
Date
6/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 05A <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />VR2013-006 <br />2833 Co Rd H <br />Allow 3' side <br />yard driveway setback <br />Approved <br />VR2014-006 <br />7851 Spring Lake Rd <br />Allow 4' side <br />yard driveway setback <br />Approved <br />VR2015-003 <br />7930 Sunnyside Rd <br />Allow 3' side <br />yard driveway setback <br />Approved <br />VR2015-004 <br />8330 Groveland Rd <br />Allow 2' side <br />yard garage & driveway setback <br />Approved <br />VR2016-001 <br />2200 Hillview Rd <br />Allow 3.5' side yard driveway setback <br />Approved <br />VR2017-001 <br />5211 Sunnyside Rd <br />Allow 3' side <br />yard driveway setback <br />Approved <br />There is a significant case history of the Planning Commission supporting variances for reduced <br />side yard setbacks. However, each variance request is unique to the property, and should be <br />decided upon based on its own merits. When there is a pattern of similar variances granted, it <br />is indicative of a larger problem that should be addressed (e.g. are driveway setbacks <br />necessary?). <br />Analysis <br />Within residential zoning districts, the minimum side yard setback for a driveway is 5'.1 <br />A Variance may be granted by the Planning Commission only in the event that all of the <br />following circumstances exists <br />a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Title. <br />b. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />c. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this <br />Title or the City Code. <br />d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the <br />same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br />circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has <br />had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. <br />e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br />f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical <br />difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />g. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such conditions upon the premises <br />benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established <br />by this Title or to reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in <br />the neighborhood and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must <br />be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the <br />variance. <br />In the Variance application, the Applicant states his request to: "Remove asphalt driveway and <br />Class 5. Replace with concrete between retaining wall's for greater improved parking surface <br />and enhanced curb appeal." <br />4 City Code, Section 1104.01, Subd 4(c)(1)(a) (Residential Uses) <br />5 City Code, Section 1125.02, Subd 2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.