Laserfiche WebLink
The Mounds View Vision <br />A Thriving Desirable Community <br /> <br /> <br /> Item No: 8G <br />Meeting Date: February 24, 2020 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9246, Support HF XXXX Fire Pension Aid <br />Apportionment <br /> <br />Background/Discussion: <br />Police and Fire pension plans receive state aid. Fire aid is distributed yearly by the state <br />from revenue collected on the insurance industry primarily and secondarily from the <br />general fund. Current law requires the aid to be deposited with a volunteer relief <br />association if one exist. If not the aid is distributed to the municipality. <br /> <br />For more than two decades, discussion on allowing the aid to be shared between the <br />volunteer relief and the city has surfaced with respect to communities protected by <br />combination departments – that is those who have both career and volunteers. <br /> <br />The issue has risen to the top of the legislative arena over the past two/three years <br />stemming from transition of volunteer departments to combination and in some cases; <br />career. <br /> <br />The 2018 legislature created two task forces (Fire Aid Apportionment and Conversions <br />and Dissolutions) to study the issue and report back in 2019. As reported verbally and in <br />many of my weekly written reports, I attended virtually all of these meetings. The task <br />force completed their work and presented to the Legislative Commission on Pensions <br />and Retirement last year at one of their first meetings. However, no advocates were <br />present at a subsequent meeting when the commission was putting together the bill and <br />Representative O’Driscoll moved to lay the bills on the table when no one was present to <br />answer questions. <br /> <br />In reaching out to LCPR staff, League Staff, Public Employees Retirement Association <br />(PERA), and Office of the State Auditor we confirmed that no one had worked on either <br />issue. The State Auditor has a work group that reviewed the apportionment “bill” but did <br />not take a position and the PERA Advisory Board for fire reliefs managed by them (State <br />Plan) failed to reach a consensus and then adjourned for the year. <br /> <br />SBM is in the state plan which operates different than the locally operated plans. In short, <br />PERA has full administration, State Board of Investment has full investment oversight, <br />and the City controls all decisions such as benefit increases. <br /> <br />Local plans do all the administration, may invest with whomever they choose, and can – <br />if they so choose, raise benefit levels without council approval if certain funding <br />parameters are met. <br />