Laserfiche WebLink
A plurality of forty-seven percent favored the financial and <br />staff time investment into creating larger development sites <br />along Highway 10 to make the area more attractive to prospective <br />buyers. But, an aggressive approach by the City -did notinclude <br />the use of its condemnation authority to acquire single parcels: <br />by a forty-six percent to thirty-nine percent margin, the sample <br />opposed this -option., A -more measured approach based on <br />persuasion. rather than compulsion is supported at this juncture: <br />A fifty-five percent majority approves of the -zoning °and <br />land use decisions made by the City during the past few -years; <br />only fourteen percent disapproved. Consistent with this <br />perception, sixty-four percent of the respondents felt that <br />residents have an adequate opportunity for input into the zoning <br />and land use decision-making process. Sixty-nine percent of the <br />community also agrees with the current pace of development. A <br />fifty-five percent majority also favors the use of .-development <br />incentives to attract new commercial -or industrial projects. <br />Ironically,: though, only twenty-eight percent of the sample knew <br />about the "Comprehensive Plan." Zoning and land use decisions <br />received solid endorsements from most residents.' <br />Development priorities" of the citizenry also reflected a <br />balance between' growth and ambience. Thirty percent of the <br />residents feel -'it is very important to attract more head -of - <br />household `jobs to the community. Only eleven percent placed a <br />similar importance on more retail shopping opportunities. But, a <br />convincing seventy-eight percent supported design and landscaping <br />standard for city' business,' and 'fifty-eight percent still <br />favored the standards even if it might retard business growth. <br />-.Like many other communities, concerns about city appearance and <br />general environment have become major issues. <br />Seventy-nine percent of the sample approved of the park and <br />recreational facilities in Mounds View; eighteen percent were <br />-less favorable. -In comparison with other communities,this is <br />just -under the 'suburban norm. Surprisingly,;given the fiscal <br />conservatism of most residents, -,-by two -to -one, sixty-one percent' <br />to thirty percent, respondents would support a bond issue to <br />upgrade and complete the park system-. A similar percentage would <br />also support an increase in park maintenance. The most pressing <br />needs that citizens noted were better maintenance and more' park <br />equipment. Park maintenance, though, received a seventy-nine <br />percent approval rating; eighteen percent disapproval. <br />Favorite indoor leisure time activities were reading, <br />television, hobbies, and family time. Sixty-nine percent of the <br />sample stated they were more likely to participate in unorganized <br />recreational activities; clearly a matter of choice, since only <br />ten percent were constrained by organized activities registration <br />fees. Similarly, residents were twice as likely to be spectators <br />rather than players of recreational sports. This was <br />corroborated by the choices of outdoor leisure time activities: <br />walking, sports, hunting and fishing, and yard work were the most <br />frequently mentioned. <br />4 <br />