My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/22/1990
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
03/22/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 2:42:20 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
3/22/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
responsive and completed in a timely fashion. On the frequency <br />of street sweeping, two-thirds of the sample supported the <br />current two or three times yearly schedule. They also provided <br />street sweeping with a strong eighty-five percent approval <br />rating. Mounds View residents, then, are unusually pleased with <br />the conditions and cleanliness off their streets. - <br />Eighty -five percent_ of the respondents also approved of <br />their police protection; only nine percent disapproved- Seventy- <br />seven percent felt the current amount of patrolling in their <br />neighborhood was about right. But, even so, a forty-eight <br />percent to thirty-eight percent plurality favored the hiring of <br />more police. -officers even if an increase in property taxes were <br />required. The Mounds View Police Department, then, is felt to be <br />doing a good job, and many residents do not oppose actions to <br />hire more police officers to meet community needs. <br />Fifty-five percent of the respondents reported participating <br />in the Mounds View curbside pick-up program. This level of <br />participation is about average for Ramsey County; albeit far less <br />than Dakota County levels. Non -participants were split into four <br />groups: those needing further information, those self -described <br />as "lazy," residences in which recycling is unavailable, and <br />participants in other recycling programs. The only change <br />residents strongly endorsed was the provision of containers: <br />seventy-two percent hope that they will be provided. There was <br />also support for more frequent pick-ups and the collection of <br />plastics. Residents supported the present hauling system over <br />any city assignment of haulers, with twice as many favoring the <br />requirement that haulers collect recyclables and - yard waste, <br />rather than the City doing 'so.. Mounds View residents are <br />amenable to recycling, but insist on retaining the choice of <br />their refuse hauler. <br />Ninety-two:'percent of the sample rated the quality of life <br />in Mounds View as either "excellent" or "good." Sixty percent <br />felt things had been changing for the better in the. community <br />during the past few years;only nine percent felt they were <br />worse. The mood among residents is both optimistic and up -beat. <br />As a general perspective, development preferences were <br />directed at single family homes. - Fifty percent support <br />attracting more of these structures, as opposed to sixteen <br />percent favoring light industry and fifteen percent, commercial <br />projects. Most residents did not see any particular area of the <br />city which sorely needed redevelopment -- lesser candidates <br />included Highway 10 and various apartment complexes. But, <br />preferences deviated from the general perspective on the question <br />of Highway 10 between County Road I and the Spring Lake Park city <br />limits: commercial and light industrial uses were favored by <br />forty-seven percent, while fifteen percent thought retail uses <br />were more appropriate. Most citizens, then, favor only single <br />family dwellings nearby or in current residential neighborhoods, <br />but support a mixed use along the major artery in the community. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.