My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/24/1990
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
05/24/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 2:44:30 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
5/24/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Counties surveyed during the pilot phase include Norman, Clay, Wilkin, Traverse, Big <br />Stone, Lac Qui Parle and Washington. The rapid development and resultant loss of <br />natural areas in the Metro area and the continued loss of native prairie habitat across the <br />state were prime reasons for selecting the pilot counties. Funds for the Survey are <br />provided in part by the "Chickadee Check -off' program which allows taxpayers to <br />contribute directly to the Nongame Wildlife Program when paying state income taxes. <br />The database is available to planners, land managers, private individuals and decision <br />makers. For more information on the Survey, contact B.J. Farley, public relations <br />coordinator of the Natural Heritage and Nongame Wildlife programs at 296-3344. * <br />Information for this report is drawn from DNR sources including the Minnesota County <br />Biological Survey Interim Report. <br />Funding for the Yawn! Here goes another article about that unspeakable issue, "How to pay for what <br />Regional Park System we want." But please try to stay with us on this one. Without a stable source of funding <br />the parks will...well you know what will happen. <br />Forty million in general obligation bonds for regional park acquisition with debt service <br />paid by State appropriations provided the basis for Metropolitan Council parks activities <br />starting in 1974. By 1977 State bonds replaced the regional bonds and from 1974 to 1980 <br />the average appropriation was $27.4 million perbiennium. However, from 1981 to 1987 <br />this average dropped to $14.5 million per biennium. <br />Regional park funding is falling far short of its needs. In 1987, the various implementing <br />agencies including St. Paul and Ramsey County, sought $31 million for capital <br />improvement funding despite actual needs of over $50 million. They received $15.5 <br />million. <br />During the first six years of the regional park system the focus was acquisition and from <br />1975 to 1980 approximately $66.1 million was invested to acquire 14,000 additional <br />acres. since 1981, less than 1,000 acres have been acquired and park development or <br />redevelopment is the major focus with $51.4 million invested. <br />The Metropolitan Council requested $50 million for capital improvement during the <br />1990 legislative session. The legislature authorized $5 and authorized the Metropolitin <br />Council to use its own bonding authority for more of the regional park needs. Since the <br />Met Council's bonding would affect property taxes, it is doubtful that the bonding <br />authority will be used this year. <br />St. Paul parks need large The numbers make it clear. Funding for urban parks is not at the top of the legislative <br />sums: $32 million at Como agenda. Looking for a stable source of funding, the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space <br />Park, 33 million at Harriet Commission and the Met Council are exploring alternatives. Possibilities include a25% <br />Island/Lilydale local matching requirement on regional grants for park and trail development/redevel- <br />opment. This proposal has a serious downside for Ramsey County. Ramsey taxes to the <br />levy limit to cover services and programs and there is little likelihood the County could <br />provide a 25% cost share with regional park dollars. The end result: Ramsey would not <br />receive regional monies. <br />A sales tax to fund the metro regional infrastructure system is another possibility. <br />Included in this system are parks, Light Rail Transit, sewers, etc. A tax of 1/2 to 1 cent <br />are currently being tossed about. <br />The discussion will no doubt heat up before the 1991 legislative session. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.