My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05/19/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 3:18:34 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:47:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
5/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APR 7 '95 10:29 FROM AM ENG TST ST PAUL TO 97843462 <br />PAGE.006 <br />AET #95-1343 - Page 5 <br />CLule oI Pwt M vemen <br />We judge that the majority of the past ground movements would be associated with consolidation <br />of the peat swamp deposits, largely due to the weight of the overburden fill. Because the fill <br />includes some organic soils, we anticipate some compression of the fill has also occurred, <br />although to a significantly lesser degree than the major swamp deposit- In addition to the soil <br />consolidation, the potential for soil frost heaving and ice lense formanon may be contributing <br />to the ground movement problem. <br />Although our evaluation lacks site specific laboratory testing, we estimate that future park <br />settlements without additional regrading should be about 3" to 4" over the next 20 years. Local <br />frost movements may also occur, which would add to the surface irregularity. Minimal grading <br />may be needed to attain a reasonably level playing surface, and if grading re1nains within about <br />'fi' of the existing surface, surface seudt=nts should remain within about 1fi' . Variation of load <br />due to the minor grading may result in the need for on-going maiia '+�..a=. Also, this type of <br />future correction would not improve surface stability (if this is important). In the event you <br />wish to improve future performance beyond that described, several options could be considered. <br />These are as follows: <br />5uxr-haitge dption <br />In order to reduce the consolidation potential of the swamp deposits, it would be possible to <br />place a surcharge upon the athletic field area thereby precompressiug the materials prior to final <br />grading. To reasonably surcharge the materials, we would suggest a minim� surcharge height <br />of 3' to 4' above the eventual final grade, and allowing the surcharge to rest for several years <br />prior to removal. It would be possible to provide a level surcharge and sod the land for athletic <br />field use during this time, although movements should be expected. If such movements were <br />deemed tolerable, you could elect to leave the surcharge in-place and use the field "as is". <br />However, we suspect the primary and secondary consolidation which would result would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.