Laserfiche WebLink
Advisory <br />All MF and MU references have been <br />The shorthand for the Mixed Use land use category is variously <br />amended to clarify the correct land use - <br />shown as MU or MF. This inconsistency should be amended for <br />Multi -Family or Mixed Use <br />clarity. <br />Surface Water Management <br />Comment <br />Response <br />Mounds View is located within the oversight boundaries of the Rice <br />Most recent LSWMP has been added to <br />Creek Watershed District. The City submitted a draft Local Water <br />this Plan as an Appendix. This version was <br />Management Plan (LWMP) update to the Council in March 2019. <br />last updated 9.14.2020 and responds to <br />Council Water Resources staff reviewed and commented on the <br />the second round of RCWD comments. <br />draft LWMP to the City and Watershed in a letter dated April 22, <br />2019. The Plan indicates on page 6-2 in the Surface Water <br />Management section of Water Resources Chapter 6 that a full copy <br />of the LWMP will be included as an Appendix to the Plan when <br />complete following review by the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />*To be considered complete for review, the City needs to submit a <br />Comprehensive Plan that incorporates the most recent draft LWMP <br />update that is currently under review by the District. The final Plan <br />that the City adopts will need to include the final LWMP that the <br />Watershed had approved, but for our review purposes at this time, <br />the most recent draft LWMP will be sufficient. <br />Special Resource Protection <br />Comment Response <br />Historic Preservation <br />A policy addressing historic sites has been <br />All plans must include a protection element for historic sites. Page 2- <br />added under goal 3 on page 2-3, and <br />18 states, "There are no historically significant or potential <br />additional language regarding historic <br />historically significant sites in Mounds View. Therefore, there is not a <br />preservation added on page 2-18. <br />need for any special measures to ensure the protection of <br />historically significant properties. The City will consider this potential <br />issue during the normal development review process." The Plan <br />must provide a policy or protection element for historic sites. On <br />page 2-12, the Plan makes reference to the need for restoration of <br />the historic and iconic Mermaid Statue, yet there are no policy <br />provisions or protection element in the Plan for historic sites. <br />Housing <br />Comment <br />Response <br />