My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2022/01/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
Agenda Packets - 2022/01/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:54 PM
Creation date
1/24/2022 10:20:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/10/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
1/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 43, 2024 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />1 City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council introduce an Ordinance that would amend <br />2 Chapter 7 regarding Levy Limits. He explained out of the 785 cities in Minnesota, 102 have a <br />3 charter, noting only two have a levy provision within the Charter. He indicated the City of <br />4 Mounds View has the most restrictive Charter in the State of Minnesota. He commented in <br />5 January of 2021, the Charter Commission began reviewing Chapter 7 and spent the majority of <br />6 the year addressing this task. He noted in September, the Charter Commission made a <br />7 recommendation of a Resolution that would amend Chapter 7 that eases the levy cap on a 6-3 <br />8 vote. It was noted Mounds View was in the lower 10% when considering the per capita levy. He <br />9 indicated the levy cap was suppressing the City's ability to levy and hire additional staff. <br />10 <br />11 City Attorney Riggs then commented on the process that would have to be followed in order to <br />12 amend the City Charter per State Statute. He indicated this provision allows the Council to adopt <br />13 an Ordinance to amend the Charter noting a public hearing would have to be held. He reported <br />14 the vote to approve the Ordinance would have to be unanimous (5-0). <br />15 <br />16 Russ Warren, 8044 Greenwood Drive, explained he was the Chair of the Charter Commission. <br />17 He offered for collective consideration, the work product from the Charter Commission. He <br />18 commented further on the joint conversations he had with the City Council regarding the levy <br />19 cap noting he understood this was the most important issue. He discussed how the current levy <br />20 limits were not keeping up with CPI and the City's expenditures. He reviewed the proposed <br />21 language change noting the City could now have a levy increase of up to 6.5%. He explained the <br />22 Charter Commission recommends approval of this new language. <br />23 <br />24 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. <br />25 <br />26 Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, discussed how the proposed language would impact <br />27 Mounds View taxpayers. She encouraged the Council to let the residents vote on this issue. She <br />28 commented on the taxes being paid by residents from Mounds View, North Oaks, Arden Hills, <br />29 Shoreview and New Brighton for a $345,000 valued home. She noted Mounds View was paying <br />30 the highest amount when compared to each City. She discussed how this amount would surge <br />31 over the next five years if the language change were approved. She understood this was a <br />32 complicated issue, but feared if the language amendment were approved, residents would not <br />33 want to move into Mounds View due to high taxes. <br />34 <br />35 Brian Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, stated this Ordinance cannot and should not be acted on <br />36 this evening. He reported the Ordinance cannot be acted on this evening because it was being <br />37 introduced this evening. He explained the City's Charter requires Ordinances to be introduced <br />38 and then 14 days prior to action being taken. He indicated the Ordinance should not be acted on <br />39 because it was a Council proposal and did not originate with the Charter Commission. Rather the <br />40 matter originated from the Council and the Charter Commission Chair brought this matter to the <br />41 Commission in January. He stated at a joint meeting in June the Council and Charter <br />42 Commission rejected the three amendments suggested by the Charter Commission and instead <br />43 supported Fridley's charter language. He commented since July staff has worked with the <br />44 Council to draft language and this language was presented to the Charter Commission by the City <br />45 Attorney. He noted all of these proposals for this amendment were driven by the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.