My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2022/01/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
Agenda Packets - 2022/01/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:54 PM
Creation date
1/24/2022 10:20:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/10/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
1/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 43, 2024 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />1 He discussed the Minnesota State Statute method for approving an Ordinance and reiterated that <br />2 the point of origin for this Ordinance was the City Council. He directed the Council to the <br />3 Statute staff included in the packet reporting this issue must go to the voters and should not be <br />4 approved by Ordinance. He encouraged the Council to follow both the spirit and letter of the law <br />5 and allow voters to vote on this matter in November of 2022. <br />6 <br />7 Bob King, 7408 Silver Lake Road, indicated the Charter was put in place before the existing <br />8 residents of Mounds View ever lived in the community. He stated he could care less what <br />9 happened in 1979. He reported levies like the one for the police department was not something <br />10 that could be controlled by the City. Rather, these matters were voted on by the citizens stating <br />11 what was needed. He commented on the size of the Mounds View Police's Department and <br />12 indicated crime was on the rise. He stated without more officers on the street, the increase in <br />13 crime could not be addressed. <br />14 <br />15 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. <br />16 <br />17 Mayor Mueller requested comment from the City Attorney regarding the comments made by Mr. <br />18 Amundsen. City Attorney Riggs reported he assisted with the drafting of the proposed Ordinance <br />19 and explained the City was taking all the proper steps in order to change Chapter 7 of the charter. <br />20 He indicated the Council could pause and take action on the Ordinance in 30 days, if this was the <br />21 desire of the Council. However, he noted the Council could also opt to take action on the <br />22 Ordinance at this meeting. <br />23 <br />24 Mayor Mueller questioned if the Charter Commission's 6-3 vote on this Ordinance amendment <br />25 should be considered contentious because it was not a unanimous recommendation. City <br />26 Attorney Riggs advised the recommendation was fitting within Subdivision 7 of the Statute, <br />27 noting a recommendation was made by the Charter Commission. <br />28 <br />29 Mayor Mueller commented on how the City Attorney had assisted the City with drafting charter <br />30 language. City Attorney Riggs indicated he had worked to draft language per the Charter <br />31 Commission and City staff. <br />32 <br />33 Mayor Mueller stated it was determined to be more efficient to have the City Attorney assist with <br />34 drafting the language amendment. She asked if the City was acting in a nefarious manner by <br />35 having the City Attorney assist with drafting the Ordinance amendment language. City Attorney <br />36 Riggs reported City Attorney's and staff often help in drafting charter language. <br />37 <br />38 City Administrator Zikmund recalled that the Charter Commission adopted a motion designating <br />39 Kennedy & Graven as the attorney for the Commission. <br />40 <br />41 Charter Commission Chair Warren stated he did not recall the Charter Commission making a <br />42 motion to designate Kennedy & Graven, but rather there was consensus to have the City Attorney <br />43 assist with drafting the language. He commented further on the language that was reviewed by <br />44 the Charter Commission members and put before the Charter Commission and individually voted <br />45 on. This led to the 6-3 vote recommending the Ordinance amendment to the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.