Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br />November 24, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />1 Mr. Ulrich explained that based upon input, staff has come up with a recommendation which would essentially <br />2 be a compromise between the current city standards and the acceptable designs posed <br />3 by the questionnaire Ms. Haake prepared. Staffs recommendation is for a 28 foot wide roadway on a portion <br />4 of Spring Lake Road with a 26 foot wide roadway on County Road I and a small part of Spring Lake Road with <br />5 curb and gutter. He noted that staff continues to be concerned about potential parking problems for residents <br />6 if the design of the roadway does not allow for parking. <br />7 <br />8 Council member Stigney asked what MSA funds would be lost if the city chose the option that would not be <br />9 MSA funded. I* Ulrich noted that it would be a percentage of the total cost, however he did not have the <br />10 exact figures available. However, not only would they lose the construction dollars allotted for the project at <br />11 this time, plus future maintenance dollars and reconstruction dollars for that segment of mileage. Because this <br />12 is a county road turn back, this will be the only opportunity for the city to consider this road for state aid <br />13 funding. <br />14 <br />15 Council member Quick asked what width that portion of Spring Lake Road is in the City of Spring Lake Park <br />16 Mr. Ulrich noted that it is 32 feet wide. Mr. Whiting asked what the life span of the various options would be. <br />17 Mr. Peters noted that this is difficult to establish as it will be based upon the amount of traffic on the roadway. <br />18 If the road is sealcoated approximately every 4 to 5 years, it could be expected to last twenty years; the time <br />19 would likely be reduced without curb and gutter. Mr. Ulrich gave examples of other projects, noting that <br />20 those without curb and gutter experience significant deterioration. . <br />21 <br />22 Mayor McCarty asked about the loss of mature trees in the project area, noting that this has been a concern of <br />23 residents all along. Mr. Peters stated he will be able to provide more information after a design has been <br />24 decided on. <br />25 <br />26 Barb Haake, 3024 County Road I, asked what portion of the project area is currently designated as MSA <br />27 roadway. Mr. Campbell, City Engineer noted that none of the project area is MSA at this time. By the end of <br />28 the year, the city must certify to the state how the road is to be designated Ms. Haake stated she believes <br />29 there are many other roads in Mounds View that could be designated MSA roadways and according to a <br />30 representative she spoke with, the money would not be lost and it would stay in a fund and could accumulate <br />31 for a period of time before it would need to be expended The cost estimate she received over the phone for a <br />32 similar roadway was considerably less than the city's, however with the additional 25% for engineering fees and <br />33 contingencies, it would add a significant amount. <br />34 <br />35 Council member Quick clarified that only turn back roads could be designated as MSA roadway, therefore the <br />36 funds could not be used unless the road under consideration met certain criteria. <br />37 <br />38 Ms. Haake noted she still believes there are other streets that could be designated MSA and she would like <br />39 professional research done to show that. Additionally, she explained that residents were never told that there <br />40 was an option to leave the street width as it currently is (24 feet). They were also told that curb and gutter was <br />41 required - they later found out that with an urban design, it is not required. She stated she would like to obtain <br />42 information in regard to the difference in dollar amounts that the city would receive each year if the entire <br />43 project were to be designated as MSA roadway. Another suggestion would be to do an asphalt road with a <br />44 two foot concrete section on both sides to protect the edges of the road Ms. Haake noted that residents would <br />45 not be so disturbed if they felt that the turn back funds were being applied to this particular project. She felt <br />46 the city should tell Ramsey County to fix the road up and keep the funds so that the residents wouldn't be left . <br />47 with the assessment. Ms. Haake noted that the best way to treat storm water is to have a holding pond An <br />