Agenda Packets - 2022/02/18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B-2 DOCSOPEN\MU210\4\780657.v4-2/17/22 requirements of Minnesota Rules and was submitted on the form similar to the sample provided by the Minnesota Secretary of State. The Ramsey County Elections Office reviewed the petition to verify the signatures on the petition for the city of St. Paul and found that a number of signatures was insufficient and certain signatures were invalid because “(1) the signer did not provide all of the required information; (2) the signer was not eligible to vote in St. Paul; (3) the signer’s information was illegible; and (4) the same person signed more than one line on the petition.” The petitioner challenged the City’s use of SVRS to verify the petition and the Minnesota Court of Appeals found that using SVRS to verify petitions is appropriate. - It should also be noted that both the Petitioners and the Perry Letter refer to the fact that the City applies Minnesota Rules to determine sufficiency as a “legal loophole”. In a footnote to the Butler decision the Court of Appeals notes that “[d]uring oral argument, Butler's counsel argued that Minn. Stat. § 204B.071 grants the secretary of state authority to adopt rules only relating to nominating and referendum petitions and therefore Minn. R. 8205.1050 does not apply to charter-amendment petitions. This assertion is incorrect.” Only In Re Grand Rapids involves a petition that was similarly deficient to the petition submitted by the Petitioners and lacked the necessary information used to validate signatures. As is mentioned above, the relief granted by the district court was to give the petitioner two days to amend the petition and he was able to do so. The main issue in that case was that the petitioner was not given time to amend the petition to fix the errors and the statute under which the petition was brought did not include any mechanism or timelines under which the city or petitioners were required to respond. This is significantly different than the petition submitted by the committee of petitioners under Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12 because Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12 includes timelines under which the city and petitioners are to respond and submit amended materials.