Laserfiche WebLink
CITY CHARTER – LEVY CAP <br />Section 7.03 <br />Subdivision 1. The City's annual resolution to levy ad valorem taxes (raising money against real and <br />personal property) shall not exceed the lesser of the following formulas; either the prior year tax levy <br />dollar amount increased by a maximum of 5%, or CPI (Consumer Price Index) plus 2%. The CPI shall <br />be the 12 month average of the most recently published data for all Urban Consumers in the <br />Minneapolis, St. Paul metropolitan area, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor <br />Statistics. <br /> <br /> <br />HOW DID WE GET HERE? <br />The Recession of 2001/2002 caused the State to Slash Local Government Aid to Cities starting in 2003. <br />Mounds View aid declined from $790,000 in 2002 to $0 in 2006, this represented 16.5% of the 2002 <br />budget. The City Council was forced to increase property taxes to replace some of the lost Aid (2004 – <br />15.4%, 2005 – 27.5%) Fund Balance declined by 36% in 2003 to absorb the aid reduction that was <br />passed on to cities after their budgets were set. (Not the last time this happened) <br /> <br /> <br />CHALLENGES <br />Inflation at the City level is not the same as what we experience on a personal level – Labor, contractual <br />services, energy, and construction costs are the cost drivers at the City level. These costs tend to increase <br />at a higher rate than the published rate of inflation. <br /> <br />The City is asked to do more by the Federal Government, the State Government, the County <br />Government, The Metropolitan Council, Residents, and Businesses. Changing demographics and an <br />increasing population also require more services. (2010 – 12,155, 2020 – 13,513) This has been done <br />with essentially the same sized staff for the last 20 years. We have averaged about 50 FTE’s during that <br />period with 2021 budgeted at 52.5. It has become more difficult to maintain the same level of services <br />and respond to increasing governmental requirements and an increasing population. <br /> <br />Fund balance will decline as a percentage of revenue, which will make it more difficult to respond to <br />future challenges should they occur. <br /> <br />Modifying the charter cap will provide needed flexibility to address the structural issues that the City <br />will face in the future. <br />