My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2022/02/18
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
Agenda Packets - 2022/02/18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:30 PM
Creation date
3/30/2022 9:48:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/18/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
2/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY CHARTER – LEVY CAP <br />Section 7.03 <br />Subdivision 1. The City's annual resolution to levy ad valorem taxes (raising money against real and <br />personal property) shall not exceed the lesser of the following formulas; either the prior year tax levy <br />dollar amount increased by a maximum of 5%, or CPI (Consumer Price Index) plus 2%. The CPI shall <br />be the 12 month average of the most recently published data for all Urban Consumers in the <br />Minneapolis, St. Paul metropolitan area, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor <br />Statistics. <br /> <br /> <br />HOW DID WE GET HERE? <br />The Recession of 2001/2002 caused the State to Slash Local Government Aid to Cities starting in 2003. <br />Mounds View aid declined from $790,000 in 2002 to $0 in 2006, this represented 16.5% of the 2002 <br />budget. The City Council was forced to increase property taxes to replace some of the lost Aid (2004 – <br />15.4%, 2005 – 27.5%) Fund Balance declined by 36% in 2003 to absorb the aid reduction that was <br />passed on to cities after their budgets were set. (Not the last time this happened) <br /> <br /> <br />CHALLENGES <br />Inflation at the City level is not the same as what we experience on a personal level – Labor, contractual <br />services, energy, and construction costs are the cost drivers at the City level. These costs tend to increase <br />at a higher rate than the published rate of inflation. <br /> <br />The City is asked to do more by the Federal Government, the State Government, the County <br />Government, The Metropolitan Council, Residents, and Businesses. Changing demographics and an <br />increasing population also require more services. (2010 – 12,155, 2020 – 13,513) This has been done <br />with essentially the same sized staff for the last 20 years. We have averaged about 50 FTE’s during that <br />period with 2021 budgeted at 52.5. It has become more difficult to maintain the same level of services <br />and respond to increasing governmental requirements and an increasing population. <br /> <br />Fund balance will decline as a percentage of revenue, which will make it more difficult to respond to <br />future challenges should they occur. <br /> <br />Modifying the charter cap will provide needed flexibility to address the structural issues that the City <br />will face in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.