My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-2022 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
11-28-2022 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:32 AM
Creation date
12/14/2022 7:40:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/28/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
11/28/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller indicated she was concerned about the number of exceptions within this PUD. She <br />stated City Code would require this development to have 350 parking spaces and the developer <br />was only proposing to have 198 spaces. She believed this was a major concern given the fact the <br />site was estimated to have 340+ residents. She feared an undue burden would be placed on the <br />neighborhood if traffic were to spill out from the apartment complex into the neighborhood. She <br />believed the developer was trying to shoe-horn a large project onto a small lot. She understood <br />that single family homes was not the right fit for this property, but nor did not believe this large of <br />a project was the right fit for the property, especially given the traffic concerns surrounding this <br />site. She reported the City of Arden Hills would be constructing a great deal of housing on their <br />327 acres of vacant land at some point in the near future. She stated she would hate to see Mound <br />View using its last five acres of undeveloped land to put up another apartment building when the <br />City already had over 30% of its population living in rental housing. She explained she appreciated <br />the efforts of the developer, but noted she did not support this project. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause asked if staff had traffic count information for Woodale between <br />Mound View Boulevard and Edgewood. City Administrator Zikmund stated staff has not put its <br />counters out on this stretch of roadway. <br /> <br />Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson commented on the history of Woodale Drive <br />noting that it used to be a State Aid roadway. He explained in 2016 the City was over its allotment <br />for State Aid. For this reason, the City made a decision to pull this roadway out of the State Aid <br />program. He indicated there were no recent traffic counts from the State for this roadway, which <br />meant the last official counts would be from 2015. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Cermak. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance <br />998, Amending the Official Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard, from R-1 Single <br />Family Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller encouraged the Council to consider if they need more information, such as a traffic <br />study, before moving forward with this project. He invited the Council to visit this area of Mounds <br />View and to visualize how a large apartment complex would impact these neighbors. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Table Action on Ordinance 998 to the December 12, 2022 <br />City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald stated if the Council were to table action on the first <br />reading of this ordinance to December, the remaining items for this project would not be <br />considered until January of 2023. <br /> <br />City Administrator Zikmund reported an action to table is non-debatable. <br /> <br />Council Member Bergeron asked what would be gained or lost by tabling action on this item. City <br />Attorney Riggs reported the City would lose time but noted the City could gain additional <br />information, such as a traffic study. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause questioned if staff could have a traffic study completed by December
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.