Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />12, and therefore the matter would not have to be tabled. City Attorney Riggs stated this <br />information could be available. He discussed how if action on this item were tabled, the two other <br />public hearings would have to be tabled and renoticed. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause stated another option would be for the Council to hold an additional <br />meeting on December 26. He commented if the first reading of this rezoning were approved, this <br />did not mean the project was moving forward. He explained both Ramsey County and the State <br />of Minnesota had to approve tax credits in order for this project to move forward. In addition, TIF <br />would have to be considered by the new Council in 2023 before this project could move forward. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller reported she would like more information before this property is rezoned. She <br />explained the City Council has heard a large number of voices from the neighborhood and she <br />wanted to see the Council being receptive to these comments prior to moving this project forward. <br />She stated she was concerned with the fact Ramsey County may grant more affordable housing <br />credits in Arden Hills than in Mounds View in order to spur development in TCAAP. While she <br />appreciated all of the efforts of the developer, she believed this project was not a good fit for this <br />property. <br /> <br />Council Member Bergeron explained he was a strong component for affordable housing. He <br />commented on a fundraiser he attended for the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. He <br />reported there was a tremendous difference between affordable housing and supportive housing. <br />He noted he worked for a non-profit that deals in supportive housing. He stated he had concerns <br />with some of the statements that were made at this meeting. He believed that with a collaborative <br />spirit and an eye for efficiency the City could be committed to ensuring this project aligns with the <br />unique neighborhood needs and values, delivering lasting benefits to the residents, investors and <br />the community alike. He explained he wanted to see more collaboration from all parties involved <br />and this project has to be done thoughtfully and not just emotionally. He agreed the project should <br />not be rushed and he would support the motion to table. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller called the question. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nay – 1 (Meehlhause) Motion carried. <br /> <br />ii. Public Hearing: Resolution 9653, Approving the Preliminary Plat of <br />“WOODALE APARTMENTS”. ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs recommended the Council open the public hearing for the preliminary plat <br />for the Woodale Apartments and continue this item to the December 12, 2022 City Council <br />meeting at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 9:16 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Hull. To Continue this public hearing to the December 12, <br />2022 City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. <br />