Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 9654 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />FINDING: Based on Staff's analysis of population per household data analysis provided by <br />the Metropolitan Council, Staff estimates the 140-unit apartment building will be <br />home to 343 residents, including 72 residents that are school -age. <br /># of units <br />Age 0-4 <br />Age 5-17 <br />Age 18+ <br />Total <br />1-bedroom <br />35 <br />1.19 <br />1.54 <br />43.51 <br />2-bedroom <br />70 <br />16.31 <br />25.62 <br />120.05 <br />3-bedroom <br />35 <br />15.23 <br />44.38 <br />74.73 <br />TOTAL <br />140 <br />33 <br />72 <br />238 <br />343 <br />Source: Metropolitan Council summarization of American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata <br />Sample (PUMS), 2015-2019 <br />The use will not create an excessive burden to public services. <br />11. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br />residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br />there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land; <br />FINDING: The project is adjacent to (east & west) single-family homes. Homes to the west <br />will be screened by coniferous trees, 8' in height, growing about 1' per year to a <br />mature height of 40' — 60'. The building height is 42' — 54'. Screening along the <br />west property line is sufficient. Homes to the east will be screened by a <br />combination of a retaining walls and fence, with a total height ' - <br />Screening along the east property line is insufficient, but acceptable considering <br />the eastern properties are guided for redevelopment. Development of the <br />apartment building will not deter development of vacant or underutilized land <br />(e. g. eastern properties). <br />12. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br />adjacent residential properties; <br />FINDING: The project will be constructed consistent with plans submitted by Kaas Wilson <br />Architects, dated October 7, 2022, as reviewed by the Planning Commission <br />(November 2, 2022) and City Council (November 28, 2022). <br />13. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the <br />city and to the existing land use; <br />FINDING: The use (140-unit apartment building) is needed, in the implementation of the <br />Comprehensive Plan, specific to providing affordable housing (will reduce the <br />City's 2021-2030 Allocation of Need by [14] units). Further, development of this <br />vacant land as an apartment building is consistent with redevelopment of this <br />block along Mounds View Boulevard, since 2014. <br />14. The use is consistent with the purposes of this chapter and the purposes of the zoning <br />district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use; <br />FINDING: The use (140-unit apartment building) is consistent with Mounds View City Code <br />Chapter 160 (Zoning), will approval of a Zoning Map Amendment, Final Plat, <br />CUP/PUD, and Development Review. The use is consistent with the proposed <br />zoning (PUD). <br />